Experts and users discuss network neutrality, net neutrality, society: Want Net Neutrality? It’ll Cost You
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Want Net Neutrality? It’ll Cost You
- From Hands Off the Internet
By Hands Off the Internet
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Paying for Traffic
I want to pay for my traffic. I always have. I don't want some tiered internet. I don't want to have things like "Pay $2.99 for our YouTube Hi-Speed package!" because given the chance to charge exorbitant fees for something simple and cheap to provide, companies will. Especially telecom companies.
Look at cellphones. My cellphone provider charges me 5 cents a text message. Looking at that in bandwidth, it's something like a few hundred dollars per megabyte. This is not their cost, not even close to their cost but, because they control the platform, the servers and they even extend this to control how the cellphone makers do the features on the phones themselves.
Even though my phone has memory banks for litterally millions of text messages, I can only store 30 on my phone without deleting them so I can receive more. There are many more examples of them extracting money for duplicate or artificial restrictions on my data or communications.
This is a result of creating an environment where a utility (something I need) is allowed to be locked down and controlled by one party. I wouldn't advocate Net Neutrality but, I would advocate something along the lines of DSL connection sharing rules for Cable and other internet providers. Basically, these rules said that DSL companies had to share their lines with competitors and the price of a DSL connection shot through the floor, many additional features were given to customers all because companies had to compete. I think Cable companies should have to compete like DSL companies do and that would assure true Net Neutrality in a far more effective and legally free way than passing laws.
This would change the main objection to creating laws being that companies aren't going to self regulate and market pressures can't happen when there are either one or a few providers. By creating rules that force cable companies to provide a way for their competitors to lease their lines like DSL companies, places where only cable is available will have the market pressure for ensuring their freedom and pushing market prices.
Another thing that makes me mad is that telecom companies are data providers. They increasingly want to hold my data and personal information to leverage it against me, make me pay for access to it. Cell phone companies do this when they store you photos online and then charge you data access fees to see your photos from your phone when you have plenty of storage on that phone to locally hold those picture files. Restrict data access programs that can send text messages or voip applications that can send voice calls through a data line instead of paying higher fees for voice calls through the provider even though they are using voip technology on their end to reap the same discounts and benefits.
Without competition, this will naturally occur because it is more profitable for these companies. Regulations should be in place to spur competition rather than forcing the content to be delivered in a certain way.
- slack September 4, 2008 11:16AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.