Should the Government Regulate Net Neutrality?

Should the Government Regulate Net Neutrality?

Net neutrality is the principle that says all information flowing across the Internet should be treated equally. But with more people streaming data-rich video and playing online games, the Internet faces congestion concerns. Should carriers be able to sell multi-tiered access to heavy users? Should sites that generate massive traffic -- like Google and Yahoo! -- pay extra fees? The U.S. Government is examining Net Neutrality and its financial, legal and social implications. Do we need federal intervention to ensure fairness, or is this an issue for the market to work out?

Next question in Society

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 1 Comment on this Argument. See all 42 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Argument
Want Net Neutrality? It’ll Cost You
- From Hands Off the Internet
No Side
By Hands Off the Internet

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • slack
    Paying for Traffic

    I want to pay for my traffic. I always have. I don't want some tiered internet. I don't want to have things like "Pay $2.99 for our YouTube Hi-Speed package!" because given the chance to charge exorbitant fees for something simple and cheap to provide, companies will. Especially telecom companies.

    Look at cellphones. My cellphone provider charges me 5 cents a text message. Looking at that in bandwidth, it's something like a few hundred dollars per megabyte. This is not their cost, not even close to their cost but, because they control the platform, the servers and they even extend this to control how the cellphone makers do the features on the phones themselves.

    Even though my phone has memory banks for litterally millions of text messages, I can only store 30 on my phone without deleting them so I can receive more. There are many more examples of them extracting money for duplicate or artificial restrictions on my data or communications.

    This is a result of creating an environment where a utility (something I need) is allowed to be locked down and controlled by one party. I wouldn't advocate Net Neutrality but, I would advocate something along the lines of DSL connection sharing rules for Cable and other internet providers. Basically, these rules said that DSL companies had to share their lines with competitors and the price of a DSL connection shot through the floor, many additional features were given to customers all because companies had to compete. I think Cable companies should have to compete like DSL companies do and that would assure true Net Neutrality in a far more effective and legally free way than passing laws.

    This would change the main objection to creating laws being that companies aren't going to self regulate and market pressures can't happen when there are either one or a few providers. By creating rules that force cable companies to provide a way for their competitors to lease their lines like DSL companies, places where only cable is available will have the market pressure for ensuring their freedom and pushing market prices.

    Another thing that makes me mad is that telecom companies are data providers. They increasingly want to hold my data and personal information to leverage it against me, make me pay for access to it. Cell phone companies do this when they store you photos online and then charge you data access fees to see your photos from your phone when you have plenty of storage on that phone to locally hold those picture files. Restrict data access programs that can send text messages or voip applications that can send voice calls through a data line instead of paying higher fees for voice calls through the provider even though they are using voip technology on their end to reap the same discounts and benefits.

    Without competition, this will naturally occur because it is more profitable for these companies. Regulations should be in place to spur competition rather than forcing the content to be delivered in a certain way.

    - slack September 4, 2008 11:16AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Regulate Net Neutrality?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Cato Institute
    The Cato Institute was founded in 1977 by Edward H. Crane. It is a non-profit public policy research foundation headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Institute... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.