Should the U.S. Use Military Force Against Iran?

Should the U.S. Use Military Force Against Iran?

Once a distant, mysterious land, the U.S. has become intensely embroiled in Middle Eastern politics. While simultaneously waging campaigns in both Afghanistan and Iraq, America has turned a wary eye to Iran and its alleged nuclear weapons. With the lives of potentially thousands of soldiers and citizens at stake in both countries, should the U.S. take direct military action against Iran?

Next question in War on Terror

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 3 Comments on this Argument. See all 110 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Argument
The US Must Aim at Toppling Down the Regime
- From David Bukay
Yes Side
By Dr. David Bukay - University of Haifa

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • HBinswanger
    Iran's theocracy must be toppled

    Yes, *both* military and ideological attack must be used against Iran, the "motherland" of Islamic totalitarianism. There can be no compromise, no diplomacy or "talks" with an enemy dedicated to your destruction, and who has already attacked you. Iran's attack began with the hostage-taking in '79 and continues to this day in its sponsoring, supplying, and guiding the attacks on our soldiers in Iraq.

    We already *are* at war with Iran.

    - HBinswanger August 21, 2008 11:25AM

    Reply to this Recommend (2) Icon flag Side: Yes

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • akahn
    Why should the US fight Israel's War?

    Why Should the US risk it's soldiers and wealth to protect Israel? To each country their own.

    We've already shown that we are a failure when it comes to regime change--why tangle with a larger, stronger country?

    - akahnUS November 11, 2008 7:52AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Submariner
    Must we?

    If anything we should strike Isreal in retaliation for the unprovoked attack on the USS Liberty.

    Considering the effort US interests put into establishing Isreal and the effort US interests put into exploiting Iran, I really fail to see the moral imperative here.

    Maybe if Isreal would stop raiding villages in areas it deems itself worthy to govern it would have the resources to topple Iran itself.

    Or maybe, if we take a breath and get a clue, we might give the people there a chance to take matters into their own hands and topple their own tyrants.

    - Submariner September 3, 2009 3:14AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

U.S. Military in Iran?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • David Bukay
    David Bukay (Ph.D.), teaches at the School of Political Science in the University of Haifa. His main fields are: International Terrorism and Islamic fanaticism;... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.