Does Intelligent Design Have Merit?

Does Intelligent Design Have Merit?

With about 70 billion stars and as many as 100 million life forms (at least here on Earth), the universe is a stunningly complex place. Did all of this matter evolve independently, or was it guided by a larger force – as proponents of intelligent design believe? With the debate raging in living rooms, classrooms and courtrooms, the stakes are high when it comes to determining intelligent design’s merit.

Next question in Religion in Society

  • “Yes”
  • No Objections Yet

Michael Behe

The Sophisticated Nanotechnology of the Cell Reeks of Design

Dr. Michael Behe

Author/Professor

Recommend (4) Comments (83)
Post a Comment

In the 19th century, the time of Darwin, the underlying basis of life was completely unknown. It was only in 1838 that the German scientists Matthias Schleiden and Theodor Schwann advanced the “cell theory” of life — that all organisms were composed of cells and their secretions, and that the cell somehow had a life of its own. Yet microscopes of that time were crude compared to modern technology, and little could be seen of the cell, and how it worked was a mystery. One well-known scientist, Ernst Haeckel, declared the cell to be a “simple little lump of albuminous combination of carbon,” (1) not much different from a piece of microscopic Jell-O.

He was spectacularly wrong. As science advanced in the next century, new techniques allowed us to see the molecules that perform the work of the cell. In the early 1950s Watson and Crick first deduced the double helical shape of DNA; later in the decade the genetic code was cracked. In the late 1950s the structure of the protein myoglobin was uncovered, revealing a complex, intricate shape that confounded scientists’ expectations that proteins would be simple, like crystals. In fact, proteins had complex shapes for the same reason that machines do — their shapes allow them to perform their tasks.

As science progressed in the second half of the 20th century and the early part of the 21st, the complexity of the cell has grown deeper and deeper. Not only has molecular machinery of staggering sophistication been discovered, but unsuspected complex control mechanisms which allow the cell to build the machinery at the right time and place have been discovered, too. As a writer for the world’s premier science journal, Nature, marveled in an article describing our increasing understanding of the immense sophistication of genes, “The picture these studies paint is one of mind boggling complexity.” (2) Complex molecular circuitry, unsuspected only a few decades ago, is now known to be required to build even “simple” animals such as fruit flies.

Design is recognized in the purposeful arrangement of parts, and the cell exhibits the most profound purposeful arrangement of parts in the universe. To get a flavor of that purposefulness, readers should view the astonishing molecular simulation of the cellular construction of the bacterial flagellum, produced by the “Protonic NanoMachine Project” of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation in a remarkable video which can be viewed on the Web. (3)

If “scientific merit” is judged by the correspondence between theory and physical reality, then the theory of intelligent design rates very strongly.

Evidence

IcotextText
1. Farley, J. (1979)
The Spontaneous Generation Controversy from Descartes to Oparin, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p. 73.
IcotextText
2. Pearson, H. 2006
What is a gene? Nature 441:398-401
IcolinkLink
3. Protonic NanoMachine Project
Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

"Yes" Michael Behe
"Yes" Discovery Institute
"Yes" Jay W Richards PhD
"No" Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights
"No" National Center for Science Education
"No" AUSCS
Most Objections

Intelligent Design?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Jay W Richards PhD
    Jay W. Richards is Research Fellow and Director of Acton Media at the Acton Institute in Grand Rapids, Michigan. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology (with... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.