Was the World Created in Six Days?

Was the World Created in Six Days?

According to Genesis, God created the universe in six days and rested on the seventh. Many religious followers believe literally that everything from the air we breathe to the water we drink was created in a matter of days. Others scoff at this interpretation, insisting that the universe couldn’t have possibly been created in such a short time span. What really happened “in the beginning”?

Next question in Religion in Society

  • “No”
  • No Objections Yet

Gary Hurd

The Six Day Creation is Incompetent Theologically

Dr. Gary Hurd

Archaeologist/Researcher

Recommend (5) Comments (10)
Post a Comment

Even the most recent portions of the Christian Bible are thousands of years old, and written in languages not commonly spoken today. The interpretation difficulty this presents to Christians is reflected in the hundreds of Christian denominations and sects, many violently opposed to one another. An even greater problem is the proper interpretation of texts far older which were written in languages no one living has ever heard spoken.   

The six day creationists typically make the following claims; the Book of Genesis is a perfect, inerrant and historical text that can be readily understood from the “plain reading” alone. They will also insist that if their interpretation is rejected, then the entire text of the Bible must also be rejected. In public lectures, I hold up a King James Bible by the 3 physical pages which contain Genesis 1-11 and point out, “Young earth creationists say you have denied all the rest of the Book if you don’t like their interpretation of these three pages.” I am fascinated by the fact that the only other people to make this argument are atheists attempting to discredit the Bible by pointing to the obvious failure of Genesis to conform with scientific observation.

Popular books by “the new atheists” such as Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, or Richard Dawkins make the same core argument as young earth creationists Ken Ham or Jonathan Sarfati; the truth or falsity of the Bible is to be evaluated by how well the text conforms to modern observations of the physical universe. Where they differ is that the creationists reject science. The Answers in Genesis statement of belief insists that, "No apparent, perceived, or claimed interpretation of evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record." Of course, they mean by "Scriptural record" their particular interpretations.

This central irony is why a more thoughtful theologian such as John F. Haught can appear as a pro-science witness in the Dover, Pa. Intelligent Design creationism trial and also author a book, “God and the New Atheism” (2008) challenging Harris, Hitchens, and Dawkins.

This is not a new problem. Thomas Aquinas (c.a. 1225 – 1274) wrote in “Summa Theological” (1273), "In discussing questions of this kind two rules are to be observed, as Augustine teaches.   The first is, to hold to the truth of Scripture without wavering. The second is that since Holy Scripture can be explained in a multiplicity of senses, one should adhere to a particular explanation only in such measure as to be ready to abandon it if it be proved with certainty to be false, lest Holy Scripture be exposed to the ridicule of unbelievers, and obstacles be placed to their believing."  

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

World Created in Six Days?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Joseph Amodeo
    Joseph Amodeo is a graduate student at the University at Albany, pursuing a Master of Arts in Political Science with research focusing on health policy and... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.