Should the D.C. Handgun Ban Have Been Overturned?

Should the D.C. Handgun Ban Have Been Overturned?

Washington, D.C. is the nation’s political capital, but tragically it’s also known as America’s murder capital. In an effort to curb homicides, the city banned its citizens from owning handguns starting in 1975. More than 30 years later, the U.S. Supreme Court recently overturned the law, saying "the absolute prohibition of handguns" was unconstitutional. The decision sparked a legal chain reaction as similar lawsuits were filed in Chicago and San Francisco. Was this the right verdict for the safety of D.C. citizens and the nation?

Next question in Guns

  • “Yes”
  • No Objections Yet

Gun Owners of America

The Police are Not Obliged to Protect the People

Gun Owners of America

There are not enough police to protect DC residents, nor are the authorities there duty bound to protect them.  How ironic that the same city which says it can’t protect its citizens also prevents those same citizens from protecting themselves.

Warren v. District of Columbia was a case where a woman was gang raped for fourteen hours, even though she had phoned the police twice before the rapists gained entry into her apartment. The police never arrived.  Ms. Warren sued the District of Columbia for negligence in protecting her, but the court ruled in favor of the District, stating:

[The] government and its agents are under no general duty to provide ... police protection to any particular individual citizen, but, rather, duty to provide public services is owed to [the] public at large. [See Warren v. District of Columbia, D.C. App., 444 A. 2d 1, (1981).]

Thankfully, another DC resident, Becky Griffin, did have a gun.  In December, 1993, Becky used an unregistered firearm to defend her family from certain death.

After two thugs entered Becky's home, they began preparing to burn the house.  They were armed with knives and had already tied up one of her daughters with duct tape. As one of the intruders charged Becky, she grabbed her gun and shot him.  The other fled -- that being the good news. The bad news is that Becky was in possession of an illegal gun.

A Washington Times editorial summed up the predicament this way:

A Northwest woman fended off two thugs . . . saving her life and those of her daughters in the process. Now comes the hard part: waiting to see if the U.S. attorney's office will charge her with illegally defending herself. There is nothing in DC law that exempts those . . . who use weapons [banned since 1976] in self-defense.

Most people would agree:  it's absurd that officials should even have the option to prosecute someone for a clear-cut case of self-defense.

Evidence

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

End Handgun Bans?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • States United to Prevent Gun Violence
    States United to Prevent Gun Violence Research and Education Fund is an association of independent state-wide gun violence prevention organizations. The purpose... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.