Experts and users discuss global warming, environment: The Law of Unintended Consequences
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





The Law of Unintended Consequences
- From The Heartland Institute
By The Heartland Institute - Chicago-Based Think Tank
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Stop global warming; eat less meat
Your example of corn is downright wrong:
SEVEN TIMES MORE GRAIN IS FED TO FARM ANIMALS (MEAT, DAIRY, ETC) THAN IS PROCESSED FOR BIOFUELS. If there is a decrease in the supply of corn, it's related to the consumption of animal products.
People working to decrease our dependency on petroleum by creating ethanol and other biofuels are not responsible for the increased cost of corn. Those responsible are the major consumers (animal agriculture) and commodities traders. Don't blame the state of our economy on scientists.
Don't call the results of commodities traders' calculated plans "unintended consequences." Those who bought low and sold high surely wouldn't call their investments "unintended consequences." The cost of housing didn't skyrocket a few years ago because supply decreased or demand increased. The cost went up because of gamblers - loan companies willing to bet on the housing market. It's the same with corn.
(By the way, decreasing our meat consumption can help slow climate change.)
- ElaineVigneault
September 1, 2008 9:27PM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.