The Dangers of Dirty Needles

One of the most potent negative images associated with drug use is the needle—the needle in the shaky hand of a junkie searching desperately among the tracks on his arm or leg for a vein healthy enough to receive one more injection; the needle hanging from the arm of an addict unconscious or dead from an overdose; the contaminated needle passing its deadly load of HIV or hepatitis to the next user and, through him, to his wife or lover and their unborn child. Small wonder that a prominent and persistent goal of U.S. drug policy, from the federal to the local level, has been to deny drug users easy access to needles and to punish them whenever they are found with one.

The illegal drugs that users most commonly inject are heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamines, although each of these can be taken by other means, such as snorting, smoking, or ingesting orally. Obviously, the use of these drugs, particularly in the corrupted state in which they typically reach the retail market, is risky business. This inherent risk is substantially increased when users share needles contaminated by blood-borne diseases, most notably HIV/AIDS and hepatitis A, B, and C. The actual result is stunning.

Informed estimates of the number of injecting drug users (IDUs) range from a quite conservative 1 million to a more common figure of approximately 1.4 million. By 2006, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 36 percent (270,721) of AIDS cases in the United States had occurred among IDUs, their sexual partners, and their offspring; 28 percent of new cases are traceable to IDUs.

Hepatitis C, the most dangerous variant of that disease, is also rampant among IDUs in this country; surveys consistently find that between half and 80 percent of injectors contract the virus within the first year of needle use and that it is found in the blood of even higher proportions (70-90 percent) of all adult IDUs.

A contaminated needle is an extremely efficient transmitter of a blood-borne disease, and the virus can live on a needle for as long as four days. Further, since the CDC estimates that at least a quarter of the people infected with HIV were unaware of it until they were diagnosed, and since the rapidity of infection with hepatitis C surely results in an even greater percentage of unsuspecting carriers, needle users are key agents in the spread of these deadly epidemics.


Joey Tranchina's picture

There is almost nothing in you post that requires comment. You clearly presented medical and epidemiological facts. But the fact is that all of the risks associated with the transmission of blood-borne pathogens can be eliminated by the use of sterile injection equipment and other supplies. There is very little that we can to about the health consequences of poor quality — adulterated drugs ; that is an artifact of drug war (pure drugs bring their own problems), but the spread of disease can be arrested — and is being arrested — by the provision so syringes and supplies. The important message is that this is a problem with a solution, a fact that is too rare in our struggles with the HIV epidemic.

We can slow the spread of HIV and hopefully also hepatitis, although our success with HCV is less dramatic, because a majority of IDU get infected with the far more infectious HCV early in injection careers and come to exchange pre-infected.

Apart from the economics of funding programs in the US, syringe exchange is a success story.

The only comment that I would make about the data in your presentation is around your statement about virus remaining infectious for "four days." Four days is a very long time for HIV to remain active, UNLESS is it encapsulated in dried blood which creates an anaerobic environment ; then research indicates that it could be infectious for far longer than four days (HCV even longer.)

Thank you for a very clear presentation...jt

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social

 

randomness