Should Cities Fund Needle Exchange Programs?

Should Cities Fund Needle Exchange Programs?

Nearly one-in-five new HIV cases are the result of drug users sharing dirty needles, an extrodinarily high number. Some cities have attempted to combat the epidemic by giving free clean needles to addicts in exchange for used ones. These programs are highly controversial in the U.S., with many insisting such programs encourage drug use and increase crime. Should your community be funding needle exchange programs?

Next question in Drug Law

  • “More Than Just ...”
  • No Objections Yet

William Martin PhD

The Dangers of Dirty Needles

William Martin, Ph.D.

Baker Institute, Rice University

One of the most potent negative images associated with drug use is the needle—the needle in the shaky hand of a junkie searching desperately among the tracks on his arm or leg for a vein healthy enough to receive one more injection; the needle hanging from the arm of an addict unconscious or dead from an overdose; the contaminated needle passing its deadly load of HIV or hepatitis to the next user and, through him, to his wife or lover and their unborn child. Small wonder that a prominent and persistent goal of U.S. drug policy, from the federal to the local level, has been to deny drug users easy access to needles and to punish them whenever they are found with one.

The illegal drugs that users most commonly inject are heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamines, although each of these can be taken by other means, such as snorting, smoking, or ingesting orally. Obviously, the use of these drugs, particularly in the corrupted state in which they typically reach the retail market, is risky business. This inherent risk is substantially increased when users share needles contaminated by blood-borne diseases, most notably HIV/AIDS and hepatitis A, B, and C. The actual result is stunning.

Informed estimates of the number of injecting drug users (IDUs) range from a quite conservative 1 million to a more common figure of approximately 1.4 million. By 2006, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 36 percent (270,721) of AIDS cases in the United States had occurred among IDUs, their sexual partners, and their offspring; 28 percent of new cases are traceable to IDUs.

Hepatitis C, the most dangerous variant of that disease, is also rampant among IDUs in this country; surveys consistently find that between half and 80 percent of injectors contract the virus within the first year of needle use and that it is found in the blood of even higher proportions (70-90 percent) of all adult IDUs.

A contaminated needle is an extremely efficient transmitter of a blood-borne disease, and the virus can live on a needle for as long as four days. Further, since the CDC estimates that at least a quarter of the people infected with HIV were unaware of it until they were diagnosed, and since the rapidity of infection with hepatitis C surely results in an even greater percentage of unsuspecting carriers, needle users are key agents in the spread of these deadly epidemics.

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

Needle Exchange Programs?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • William Martin PhD
    William Martin (Ph.D, Harvard, 1969), is the Harry and Hazel Chavanne Emeritus Professor of Religion and Public Policy in the Department of Sociology at Rice.... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.