Should the U.S. Build More Coal-Fired Power Plants?

Should the U.S. Build More Coal-Fired Power Plants?

You may not be fond of coal if it's in your Christmas stocking, but some see it as a useful and beneficial source of energy. Recently more energy companies have opted to build coal-burning plants, and experts are debating whether this is a viable solution to our energy needs. They say America runs on coal, but are we running in the right direction?

Next question in Energy

  • “No”
  • “Objection”
RAN

The Country’s Dirtiest Electricity Option

Rainforest Action Network

Currently, more than 100 new coal-fired power plants are in various stages of development around the country. These new power plants will emit 400 million tons of carbon dioxide annually - which is tantamount to doubling the number of cars on our roads! Coal is the single biggest obstacle to curbing global warming, and the U.S. is poised take a giant leap in the wrong direction. Though coal-fired power plants provide nearly 50 percent of the nation’s electricity, they are our top source of air pollution and toxic mercury and are responsible for one-third of the country's greenhouse gas emissions - nearly 2 billion tons per year. In addition, U.S. coal plants are a leading cause of asthma and lung cancer.

Despite what the coal industry would have us believe, there’s no such thing as “clean coal.”

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

More Coal-Fired Power Plants?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • RAN
    Rainforest Action Network (RAN) is made up of 43 staff members in San Francisco, CA and in Tokyo, Japan, plus thousands of volunteer scientists, teachers... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.