Does Intelligent Design Have Merit?

Does Intelligent Design Have Merit?

With about 70 billion stars and as many as 100 million life forms (at least here on Earth), the universe is a stunningly complex place. Did all of this matter evolve independently, or was it guided by a larger force – as proponents of intelligent design believe? With the debate raging in living rooms, classrooms and courtrooms, the stakes are high when it comes to determining intelligent design’s merit.

Next question in Religion in Society

National Center for Science Education

Teaching ID in the Public Schools Infringes Constitutional Rights

National Center for Science Education

Special creationism is the belief that God directly intervened to create the different kinds of life and humans in particular. Legal bans on teaching evolution were struck down by the US Supreme Court in 1968, which held that such laws unconstitutionally impose religious views on public school students. In response, creationists concocted "creation science," an attempt to justify supposedly Biblical ideas like a 6,000-year-old earth, Noah's ark, and the special creation of life by using arguments that appeared superficially scientific.

Laws requiring the teaching of “creation science” were evaluated by the federal courts in the 1980s, and two courts, first in Arkansas and then in Louisiana, ruled that these policies were unconstitutionally religious. Two years after the Supreme Court struck down laws requiring the teaching of "creation science" in public schools, the first ID textbook was published.

In a 2005 federal court case, Kitzmiller v. Dover, early drafts of the textbook were subpoenaed and provided to Barbara Forrest, a scholar who researches the ties between ID and its earlier creationist ancestors, and who published that research in Creationism's Trojan Horse. Her investigation of early drafts of the ID textbook and NCSE's archives showed that the book began as a "creation science" textbook. As described in the video below, her research showed that the authors performed a global search and replace on the text in the months following the Supreme Court ruling on "creation science," replacing "creation" with "design."

The judge in the Kitzmiller case was not impressed by the attempt to sidle around the Supreme Court's ruling, and ruled that the history and content of the textbook, and of ID in general, are not legally distinct from "creation science" or other forms of special creationism. In this and a host of other ways, modern ID is simply a new gloss on long-discredited creationist views, and has no more merit than they did.

Evidence

IcovideoVideo
Linking ID to its Creationist Ancestors
Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

"No" National Center for Science Education
"No" Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights
"No" AUSCS
"Yes" Discovery Institute
"Yes" Michael Behe
"Yes" Jay W Richards PhD
Most Objections

Intelligent Design?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.