Should the U.S. Have Universal Healthcare?

Should the U.S. Have Universal Healthcare?

Nearly 50 million Americans are currently without health insurance, and many with insurance are still struggling to pay their medical bills. Everyone agrees that healthcare should be accessible to all, but the debate still rages on as to whether a universal system would be a wise or realistic solution. Is universal healthcare the remedy for what ails America?

Next question in Health Care

  • “No”
  • No Objections Yet

Institute for Policy Innovation

Single-Payer Health Care Systems Ration Care

Institute for Policy Innovation

Recommend (11) Comments (7)
Post a Comment

By Dr. Merrill Matthews, resident scholar with the Institute for Policy Innovation

Because health care spending decisions are political rather than based on supply and demand, virtually all single-payer systems face shortages and ration care.   The degree of rationing depends on the country, the budget, current political pressures and the disease with the most political clout (e.g., cancer, HIV/AIDS, heart disease, etc.).

 

For many years the Fraser Institute in Canada has published a list of waiting times in the various Canadian provinces based on the care needed.   In some cases the wait can last for months. In England , for example, the Times of London recently reported:

 

"Health service dentists have been forced to go on holiday or spend time on the golf course this month despite millions of patients being denied dental care. ... Many have fulfilled their annual work quotas allotted by the National Health Service and have been turning patients away because they are not paid to do extra work. This is despite the fact that more than 7 million people in Britain are unable to find an NHS dentist."

 

And for the last few years, newspapers have been filled with accounts of Great Britain’s National Institute for Clinical Excellence, or NICE (has any government agency ever been so misnamed?), which routinely refuses to fund certain new breakthrough prescription drugs because the committee deems them as too expensive.   From a recent edition of the Yorkshire Post:

 

"A man with terminal cancer has been refused a drug by the NHS that could extend his life—despite offering to pay part of the cost himself. ... David Swain’s offer to meet the monthly 2,000 pounds cost of Erbitux was refused, he said, because the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence ruled it was too expensive."

 

But at least the public gets good preventive care, right?   From London ’s Daily Mail:

 

"Twice Katie asked for a Pap smear test, but was told she was “too young” to need one. Now 24, she is dying from cervical cancer, one of many young women who have fallen victim to a scandalous change in health policy."

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

Universal Healthcare?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • National Physicians Alliance
    The National Physicians Alliance was founded in 2005 by former leaders of the American Medical Student Association. Membership is open to all physicians who... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.