Are Biotech Foods Safe?

The reason those tomatoes in your grocery cart are so plump and those apples are so golden is due in part to biotechnology. But while science has improved certain qualities of the foods we eat, some experts are concerned about the possible health risks in these ‘new and improved’ foods. Should you be worried?

Next question in Health

You are seeing 6 Comments on this Argument. See all 36 Comments on this Question.

Regarding Argument

Recombinant DNA is a Tool that’s Neither Inherently Safe nor Dangerous

- From CEI

Open Argument Go to this Argument

Stuff your paid propaganda!

Your endorsement of GMO technology reads like a Monsanto Commercial. In reality the scientists have very little idea what effects the modifications they make will have on a grand scale. They are simply stabbing in the dark and then rushing these things to market with little oversight.

Biotech foods are the largest uncontrolled experiment in history. With the long term effects unknown they are basically using everyone as guinea pigs.

- sporg0 December 15, 2008 9:04PM

Reply to this Recommend (0) Side: No

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Biotech foods could be safe if humans were wiser in their endeavors.

You are absolutely right. In a lab, under observation, recombinant DNA is absolutely safe and helpful. Unfortunately the science behind GMOs is being rushed from the lab as fast as possible by corporations eager to monopolize the market. The scariest advent to this brave new world thus far is the insertion of pig vaccines into corn. First off, corn is a staple food of the Americas (North, South, all of it.) 25% of the products Americans can buy from the standard market is made from corn. You would think we should be a little bit careful with this food source.

Corn genes are also very difficult to keep from spreading, which is why biologists have found genes from Monsanto's Frankenstein corn intermingling with genes in the wild corn down in Oaxaca, Mexico.

I understand that the whole reason for scientific research into GMOs is entrenched in the quest for the glorious dollar. But companies are affecting not only the entire global population now, but for generations to come, when they cut short their research in an effort to make a quick buck.

- Livvy February 27, 2009 12:43PM

Reply to this Recommend (0) Side: Uncommitted

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
- You assume
  
  that this is all to make money . May I point out that food sustains human life? Maybe producing more food will feed people?
  
  - sunshiner424 August 3, 2009 4:25PM
  
  Reply to this Recommend (0) Side: Yes
  
  Thank You for your Comment
  
  We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
  - Bioengineering is smart, but rushing isn't.
    
    You have a point - but it is a conundrum: Do we rush to put the strongest, hardest, fastest-growing, best-tasting produce on the market to feed more people? Or do we use large amounts of caution requiring us to wait a ridiculously long time period before we mass produce genetically altered food ?
    
    I think we rush too much. And I absolutely attribute this rush to the attainment of money . And I think the consequences of rushing could literally kill us all.
    
    Once a company like Monsanto finds something that works well (a genetic plant modification, for instance) they produce unnaturally large quantities of that particular plant, and do away with most other forms of said plant (because they're weak and therefore, not valuable).
    
    For example, once there were hundreds of different types of corn across America. Now the vast majority of North Americans subsist on four different types, and those four types are very similar to each other. So what happens if our corn suddenly becomes susceptible to a certain disease or parasite? You might think this is no big deal, but this lack of diversity is horrifying to the ecologist and biologist alike. In the words of Michael Pollan in the Omnivore's Dilemma: "Corn is what feeds the steer that becomes the steak. Corn feeds the chicken and the pig, the turkey and the lamb, the catfish and the tilapia and, increasingly, even the salmon, a carnivore by nature that the fish farmers are re-engineering to tolerate corn. The eggs are made of corn. The milk and cheese and yogurt, which once came from dairy cows that grazed on grass, now typically come from Holsteins that spend their working lives indoors tethered to machines, eating corn."
    
    As Americans, we don't really have a food pyramid; we have a singular pillar made almost entirely of corn. So you can see why some people have a problem with bio-engineering corporations reducing our food options out of an attempt to make a lot of money. It's very competitive, it IS a race to get genetically better products on the market, and it is incredibly short sighted in light of the fact that they have little thought towards the future of natural biodiversity.
    
    - Livvy August 4, 2009 12:09AM
    
    Reply to this Recommend (1) Side: Uncommitted
    
    Thank You for your Comment
    
    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
    - Huh.
      
      Well, I admit that I do not know very much about this topic. I didn't know how dependent America was on corn.
      
      It is scary that diversity may have decreased so substantially. This still does not make engineered food unsafe.
      
      The debate is whether they are safe or not and I assume this means safe to eat. Yes, they are safe to eat. And safe to feed to animals .
      
      What is unsafe is, I agree, lack of diversity in our diets and in the diets of the animals we eat.
      
      - sunshiner424 August 4, 2009 8:47AM
      
      Reply to this Recommend (1) Side: Yes
      
      Thank You for your Comment
      
      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
GMO info

I agree with all the negative coments on GMO but would also like to add this.
The color of the male rats testicals will turn brown not blue.
GM seeds are terminator seeds- Cant grow them again next year
Many many farmers in India commit suicide after GM crop failure because they borrowed much money from the bank and cant pay it back so they have no choice but to go to heaven and ask God to help their families.
A doctor at Sloan Kettering was asked to leave when he linked GM farmers and people who ate they GM crop with Non-Hochkins Limphoma.
There are other things but the world is just not ready to know about the rest, like who owns all the seeds stored under ground way up north, needed in the event of a whidespread crop disaster. Or the fact that now we have GMOs growing in our own intestinal flora and that means we are stealing Monsantos patent, too. Chemtrails.

- Ray-ray June 3, 2009 5:22PM

Reply to this Recommend (0) Side: No

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Related Debates

Experts on "Yes" Side

CEI
From Economy to Ecology See arguments

Experts on "No" Side

IRT
Your Consumer Safety Partner See arguments

Most Objections