Better Election System: Popular Vote or Electoral College?

Better Election System: Popular Vote or Electoral College?

If presidential elections were decided by popular vote instead of the Electoral College, Al Gore would have been elected president in 2000. How we choose a president profoundly impacts how campaigns are run, the importance of swing states and an election’s outcome. It’s certainly no surprise that the Electoral College vs. popular vote controversy has sparked considerable debate. As the issue surfaces heading into November, is it time to graduate from the Founding Father's Electoral College concept, or are popularity contests no way to choose a president?

Next question in Politics

  • “Popular Vote”
  • “Objection”
National Popular Vote

Possibility of Recounts Would Be Reduced By a National Popular Vote

National Popular Vote

There were 23 recounts among the 7,645 statewide elections conducted in the 26 years between 1980 and 2006 ― that is, one recount in 332 elections.  The average change in the margin of victory was a mere 274 votes in these 23 recounts.  Moreover, the probability of a recount drops as the size of the jurisdiction increases, and only two of the 23 recounts were in big states.  The original outcome remained unchanged in 91% of the 23 recounts.  

Under the current state-by-state system of electing the President, there are 51 separate opportunities for a recount in every presidential election.  The reason why there have been so many serious disputes in our nation’s presidential elections (5 disputes in 55 presidential elections) is that these 55 elections entailed 2,084 separate statewide counts.  In contrast, if the President were to be elected using a single nationwide pool of votes, one would expect a recount once in 332 presidential elections ― that is, once in 1,328 years.  

Indeed, the topic of recounts only comes to mind in connection with presidential elections because the current state-by-state system repeatedly produces artificial crises in which the vote is not at all close on a nationwide basis, but extremely close in a particular state.

The 2000 presidential election was an artificial crisis created because of Bush’s lead of 537 popular votes in Florida.  Gore’s nationwide lead was 537,179 popular votes (1,000 times larger).  Given the miniscule number of votes that are ever changed in recounts (averaging only 274 votes), there would have been no recount in Florida (or any other state) in 2000 if the national popular vote had controlled the outcome.  Indeed, no one (except almanac writers) would have cared that Bush had a 537-vote margin in Florida.  

Samuel Tilden’s 3% lead in 1876 was a solid victory in terms of the national popular vote (similar to Bush’s solid percentage lead in the 2004 election). However, an artificial crisis was created because of the razor-thin margins of 889 votes in South Carolina, 922 in Florida, and 4,807 in Louisiana.  
There was a recount, court case, and reversal of the original outcome in Hawaii in 1960. Kennedy ended up with a 115-vote margin in Hawaii in an election in which his nationwide margin was 118,574.  

For those genuinely concerned about recounts, a single national pool of votes is the best way to drastically reduce the likelihood of recounts and eliminate the artificial crises repeatedly produced by the current system.  No one has ever suggested that the possibility of a recount constitutes a reason why state governors and other officials should not be elected by a popular vote.

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

"Popular Vote" National Popular Vote
"Popular Vote" Common Cause
"Electoral College" Evergreen Freedom Foundation
"Electoral College" Tara Ross
Most Objections

End the Electoral College?

Loading
  • Electoral College
  • Popular Vote
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • National Popular Vote
    National Popular Vote Inc. is a 501(c)(4) non-profit corporation whose specific purpose is to study, analyze and educate the public regarding its proposal to... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.