Experts and users discuss abortion, womens rights, roe v. wade, politics, abortion debate: Politicians Shouldn’t Interfere in Private Medical Matters
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Politicians Shouldn’t Interfere in Private Medical Matters
- From NAF
By National Abortion Federation
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Safe???
"abortion is one of the most common and safest medical procedures"
Isn't that like saying the electric chair is completely safe, because the executioner doesn't get hurt? The whole purpose of the procedure is to kill someone. Not very "safe".
- Freeman
July 24, 2008 5:04PM
Reply to this Recommend (2)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Ahh pragmatism!
While the argument is about the lesser of evils, you are absolutely right. Laws have to be written from an informed and practical point of view. Moral purity is great for conversations, but the unintended consequences of trying to force your moral code on other people can be worse than the original problem.
- Adam Hammond
September 3, 2008 6:47PM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
'Politicians shouldn't interfere in Private Murderous Matters'
One could say exactly the same thing about assassins, vigilantes, robbers, and other criminals.
In effect this argument is: 'politicians shouldn't restrict private murders because they interfere with the murderer-victim relationship.'
- JKM121
September 6, 2008 4:15PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Roe vs wade was wrong and should be overturned.
Why? Because it isn't a Federal matter. It should be a states rights matter. The ONLY solution is to allow the individual states to decide whether abortion should be legal or not. That's the way it was before Roe vs Wade. In States where the majority of the population favored legal abortion it was legal (ie: NY). In states where the majority wanted abortion illegal it was illegal. It's the only fair and Democratic way to solve the problem of this very divisive issue.
- tbcass
January 22, 2009 4:56PM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Side: Uncommitted
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
leave well enough alone
I may not agree with abortion , but I do feel it is totally up to the woman involved. I would never do it myself because I could deal with the unknowns that go along with it. As far as I am concerned to each therer own and leave it that way. Roe Vs Wade legalized abortion why change it now?
- erbk1981
February 22, 2009 9:20AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
We have a responsability
I am sorry to disagree with you.
I think it should never be up only to the woman to decide because:
1. There are two humans involved: the mother and the unborn child.
2. The father has to be taken into account because the unborn child is 50%"his"
3. Such a decision should always be thought out well seeking the help of family, friends, experts, etc...
4. The unborn is not property of it's mother. he has it's own human rights (to live for example). If no one bothers to defend it's rights (it's own mother refuses) society has to protect him instead.
Roe vs Wade is flawed in many ways: http://www.abort73.com /?/abortion_facts/us_abortion_law/
- ussitano
March 13, 2009 7:58AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.