Outlawing Prostitution Does Not Protect Women
By Norma Jean Almodovar, ISWFACE President
To hear some tell it, there is no such thing as a happy hooker.... prostitution is the worst thing that happened to women since Eve got blamed for biting into the apple, and international trafficking in children and young girls to the sex trade is the only aspect of prostitution you need to know about because in their minds the rest of us don’t exist.
The truth is that there certainly are horrendous abuses around the world regarding trafficked persons- but these chronicled abuses include the trafficking in persons for labor other than prostitution. Sweatshops which manufacture garments are the recipients of many trafficked individuals, and many young girls are often sold into a lifetime of sexual slavery as child brides.
Shall we, as a concerned people who despise this unconscionable treatment of our fellow human being, insist upon outlawing marriage to prevent some young girl from being turned into a wife/ sex slave of some lecherous man who orders up his teenage bride over the internet?
Is there anyone who would deny that spousal abuse and domestic violence are serious problem in the US and around the world? So prevalent and widespread is abuse that cop cars sport bumper stickers reading “There is no excuse for domestic violence.” Battered women’s shelters are opening in record numbers and many more are needed because there are record numbers of domestic violence incidents and women needing shelter. But would anyone argue that an epidemic in domestic violence justifies prohibiting marriage to protect women from potential abuse? At the very least maybe we should mandate warning labels on wedding gowns? “Caution- connubial alliances may lead to serious bodily and emotional harm.” Heck, for that matter, so might any interpersonal relationship between any combination of genders! So what should we do? Ban all relationships to protect everyone from potential harm?
According to the September 2003 issue of the National Geographic Magazine, 27 million people world wide are bought and sold into slavery. Some are sold to businesses that make bracelets, others are sold for their physical strength to haul bricks and other heavy material on construction sites. Still others are forced into household servitude, or to pick corn and other farm crops.
Is the logical solution to end these horrible abuses a demand for an outright ban on any type of labor which could result in someone, somewhere being captured, enslaved and trafficked to a country where they will be forced to labor without compensation and where they will live in the direst of circumstances? Would it help one single trafficked person anywhere in the world if we arrest and incarcerate all household servants who have made a career out of cooking and cleaning for others, who willingly - in anticipation of being paid- apply for a job working as a servant in the home of someone who could afford their services? Could we save any of the children or young people or adults who are trafficked into the sweatshops of third world countries (and even in the US) by criminalizing commercial garment manufacturing and demand that from now on, every individual or household must make all their own clothing? And if you want a house, must you build it yourself to prevent the possibility of anyone being forced to haul bricks to build it?
Shall we criminalize and eliminate all jobs which may be considered by someone to be demeaning or degrading, whether or not the persons so employed believe they are degraded by their work? If taken to its logical conclusion, such a mandate might require that elderly persons in nursing homes who mess their pants will need to change their own diapers and clean themselves because to pay someone to do such degrading work would be illegal. The same for cleaning toilets and other janitorial labor. After all, would you want your son or daughter to clean toilets and scrub filthy floors for a living?
What if that’s the only type of work they can find? Would you prefer that your children be arrested and go to jail to prevent them from being ‘exploited’ by those who would employ them in this type of degrading profession? But what if, while they were incarcerated, they are forced to clean the toilets and scrub the floors of the bathrooms of the prison guards? And if this is the case, has their arrest and incarceration achieved the goal of protecting them from the exploitation of being employed to do the very same thing?
It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to understand that these suggestions are no solutions at all. They are neither logical or practical. And yet, the continued criminalization of all prostitution- whether or not forced- is the only solution offered by our government administration and radical leftist feminists, who insist that arresting and incarcerating grown women who have chosen to do this work will eliminate trafficking in children, young girls and adult women in the sex trade. It has not and will not eliminate it, and in the meantime, those who are arrested and incarcerated “for their own good” are put at risk of serious physical harm from law enforcement officers who are supposed to “protect them.” Time and time again, police officers have been caught raping prostitutes and also offering to trade sexual favors which would allow the prostitute to avoid arrest. Prostitutes comprise the majority of police informants- why? because the cops can and do threaten to arrest the prostitute if the prostitute doesn’t cooperate. How does this protect those children and young girls that the feminists believe they are saving?
In 1995, I was one of five current and retired prostitutes who attended the UN Women’s Conference in Beijing, China as NGO’s to speak on behalf of ourselves and other prostitutes with whom we work and with whom we engage in activism in the world wide prostitutes rights movement.
Then, as now, our voices were disallowed by the radical feminists who adamantly proclaimed that there was no possibility of a woman freely choosing to engage in prostitution, and therefore the Platform for Action Document must call for the elimination of all forms of prostitution and pornography as being “incompatible with the dignity and worth of the human person.” (may I ask how being arrested and going to jail is compatible with my dignity and worth as a human person?)
Even though we were badly outnumbered and extraordinarily underfunded, the five of us tenaciously and successfully lobbied the government delegates to change by one word the paragraph dealing with this issue- and that word was “Forced.” Sex worker activists fully and totally agree that when someone- of any age and gender is truly forced to enter prostitution or any other type of labor - there must be laws which are strongly and strictly enforced to stop this coercion.
To arrest those who voluntarily engage in prostitution- whether it is because they enjoy their work or because it is the only work they can get- will not solve the problem of children or young girls or adult women who are being trafficked into the sex trade, nor the ‘victimization and exploitation’ of women.
If you can’t go to the police to report a crime against you because the police consider you the outlaw, how does a law prohibiting ALL prostitution prevent exploitation and victimization of women in prostitution?
When scarce and valuable police resources are squandered by the use of undercover cops2 to engage in sting operations of escort services and call girl rings, it doesn’t leave time or money to pursue those who are truly violating the rights of individuals who have no desire to be in sex work- or any other type of involuntary labor. The prostitutes are told that if they don’t testify against those who give them their jobs, the prostitutes themselves will go to jail. Clients are seldom arrested - and those who are arrested are usually the ones who are soliciting street prostitutes and are very easy for the cops to catch.
So what shall we do about prostitution? The rational answer is to decriminalize all consenting adult commercial sex. Those who hire underage people and those who force anyone into this work against their will, or who takes money from a sex worker without the consent of that sex worker should face severe penalties. There are already numerous existing laws which focus on these issues and these are the laws which should be enforced.
Street prostitution could be regulated to remain in certain areas and away from residential zones, just as other public businesses. Criminal activities often associated with street prostitution such as robbery, littering, loitering, trespassing- could be enforced with increased penalties for violations of the rights of prostitutes and any others who are robbed or raped, and for violations of private property rights.
In California, the prostitution laws were revised recently and now allow the police to arrest a person if the police determine (or allege) that the person “possesses the intent to commit prostitution.” The person who possesses this intent can be in their car, whether moving or not, and the police can pull them over and charge them with the intent to commit prostitution. The cops can also confiscate the car that was being driven by the possessor of this alleged intent and a person does not have to be convicted of the crime for the government to keep this person’s vehicle.
If this doesn’t scare you that big brother government has WAY overstepped its boundaries, what will? What if it was your daughter, wife, husband, son who was in the wrong place at the wrong time? It happens more often than you think!
Whether or not you believe prostitution is a good thing, and whether or not you think women are exploited by engaging in sex work- allow consenting adult men and women to engage in whatever type of relationship they want. It is not and should not be the concern of our government what goes on in our bedrooms if we have consented to be there.

Vasopro ephedrine Dependable reactivity how to get rid of acne saber Wash 3ds max 2010 tutorials schizothymous memory
Legalization of prostitution could free owners of small businesses from the risk of accusations of sexual harassment. They would just have to say up front to the women they hire that sex with the boss is one of the job requirements.
I am just going to say...
That when prostitution is legal , it may just become a problem to park your car in the subway with all the musicians playing by the subway entrances and the loafers lying in the gutters. Not to mention the birds flying through the air.
What does any of that have to do with anything? Exactly.
Having sex for money is prostitution . If prostitution were legal , then the boss could make having sex for money (i.e. one's wages) part of the job requirements. Obviously, if prostitution were legal, then it will be legal to hire one.
The Law which the author has stated is way over board.
Taxation is simple. Only licensed prostitutes can provide the service legally and must report their income.
The laws for small businesses are already well established and clear. Nothing new need be created. A "prostitute" need only act as a small business with the usual forms and documentation and regular tax filing. Cheating on the taxes would incur the same penalties and punishments as already occur with any other small business. Of course, prostitutes might incorporate individually or together thus involving those already established practices.
One, of course, can envision certain health regulation peculiar to prostitution but it's difficult to imagine anything uniquely complex to the industry not already common elsewhere.
Forming as a business has its legitimizing qualities far more valuable than the negative tax considerations to pass up. Positive tax considerations would include deductions for business expenses, etc. that prostitutes cannot officially take advantage of now in those places where prostitution is currently illegal.
What about the unlicensed prostitutes.What would you do with them?
Or the one time prostitutes how needs some extra money to pay for her childs shoes.Would you make them get a license too?
All licensing would do would harm the poor.
"What about the unlicensed prostitutes.What would you do with them?"
The same thing that happens to anyone who operates without a license.. prosecute them.
"All licensing would do would harm the poor."
How so? Licensing brothels would protect the poor by moving their work out of the shadows where they can be exploited to where they can take a legal stand regarding their rights and pay.
If old Mrs. Howard next door needs a shelf built and is willing to bake me a scrumptious apple pie in exchange, would you call that a taxable exchange? It certainly has been an act of commerce, hasn't it? Value exchanged for value? If a tenant is willing to sleep with the landlord for a reduction in rent, is that an act of prostitution ? Is it taxable? Does it require a license? Commerce has occurred, value has been exchanged for value just as surely as if pure cash had been paid. Would you demand licensure for every technical act of prostitution? Why not demand a license for every act of commerce involving barter such as the shelves for pie transaction? Should Mrs. Howard and I be jailed or fined for our behavior? Why? Why punish the sex for rent exchange? Why punish sex for cash? Why demand licensure for any of it? Is it really anyone else's business my exchanging shelves for a pie or someone exchanging sex for rent or for cash? How does licensure improve the liberty of those involved? How does is improve the liberty of all others?
The answer is, perhaps it doesn't improve anything at all. Perhaps, it is just more of the same - control of that which ought to be free to exist without coercion or interference. Perhaps, it's people pretending to respect for individual right and liberty rather than the genuine thing.
Just as being paid a few dollars to walk a dog is not taxable income so to is getting a quick tumble in exchange for the same bit is not really prosecutable.
Licensing is to ensure a safe and healthy environment for both parties involved in prostitution .
"Prosecute them" Thats the problem now!And thats the harm to the poor.They are branded for life after there prosecuted!Make prostitution legal and free from tax.
Like their not being prosecuted now? I'd rather be prosecuted for failure to obtain a license than for prostitution .
Yes but why buy a license if you think your going to stop.Most dont like it and haves hopes to get out of prostitution .Some are good people just down on there luck.
Regulation is needed to protect the prostitutes themselves, and to ensure that a healthy environment is maintained.
We need less regulations not more.That would be more big brother that we dont need.
Like the FDA, the EPA, local health departments...
You got it.
So safe drugs, clean water, and not getting food poisoning are excessive?
Why would you say that.Laws gives us safe drugs,Laws gives us clean water,and laws gives us safe foods
So what is the difference between the laws and the regulations? The FDA regulates food and pharmaceuticals , the EPA regulates pollution, and the local heal departments regulate food establishments.
Come on now.DO you think all the other prostitutes will come running to get a license so they can be tax?
Many prostitutes are proud of the money they bring home to raise kids , care for parents, go to college . Arguing that the great majority of tax evasion will come from prostitutes is just ignorant. Like your local mechanic, electrician, plumber, restaurateur, and even you would not jump at the chance to skim a little off the top of your tax bill. Ever hear of the phrase, "will you be wanting a receipt with that?"
Yes some will.And the ones with out a license would get locked up.
No, many will come running for the legitimacy of the change . If you think about it, there are the many advantages of legal industries of which illegal prostitution cannot rightly take advantage. Also, one doesn't "tax sex", one taxes the commerce, i.e., the estimable exchange of value for value. What is the monetary value exchanged?
That's what is taxable. Sex - legal or illegal - always has and always will have economic value. The trick is deciding if the "price" paid is equal to the experience. That question is as old as the act itself.
Tell me who is the tester?For the price paid is equal to the experience.Maybe obama will made a prostitution Zar!
If it means a safe environment , a wage, not being busted by the police .
Legalizing it would also mean that people could open legal brothels. Which would hire legal prostitutes. Those places would be thriving with people willing to pay for sex but unwilling to break the law .
Illegal prostitution would not be completely eliminated, but it would be vastly reduced.
They dont pay taxes now.Why would they want to start paying taxes.Brothels would put the lower income people more at risk.They cant pay for the high price of Brothels.
The only thing with having brothels would give the rich a good time.
I'd pay taxes for being a prostitute. It would entitle me to better disability benefits , should the circumstance arise. The only " illegal " thing that could be brought to bear might be my failure to file taxes - something a lawyer can sort out without me being thrown in jail (a truly dehumanizing experience).
So why did the number of illegal speakeasies drop after prohibition ended?
Allow it to be legal and people will start legal brothels, because there would be a great deal of profit to be made in their operation... a chain of legal brothels would net a great deal of money .
I have no problem with legal brothels but what about the poor ugly ladies how are you going to tax the $20.00 BJ'S
Like I said do you think they will come running to be taxed.
those ugly poor ladies will be out of a job if there are legal brothels. who wants a to a get bj from a shady guly lady for $20 when they can get a nice bj for $25 at a legal brothel?
The poor person with only $20.00 thats who!
They may not come running to get taxed, but the lure of operating in the open and receiving a set wage will bring many.
It will not completely eliminate the problem of illegal prostitution , but it will mitigate it a great deal.
Make prostition legal but why tax them and why stick them in whore houses?
A lot of them dont what to come out in the open.They only do it to help pay there bills with a hope that some day they wont have to hook for a living.
They not want to be looked down on.They are in hard times.
We tax them just as all job positions are taxed, to pay for the public services that we all enjoy.
Prostitution is labor you don't tax labor.
Payroll and Social Security taxes would disagree with you.
Thats why we need a fair tax.And do away with the IRS
Should the Johns 1099 them?
Except that the Fair Tax (as a consumption tax) is regressive, hitting lower income classes harder then upper ones (lower classes spend a higher portion of their income on consumables vs. investments).
Yes but give the poor a refund of there taxes at the end of the year like a earner income.Now they have a savings that they would not have had other wise.
Isn't that the same as welfare then?
You are taking all of their money throughout the year and then handing it back out in a chunk at the end? Why not just reduce the consumption taxes throughout the year to provide the lower income bracket with more money?
Because it does not work.
So doling out huge payments to balance out the cost of living (welfare) will not work... or is it reducing taxes on consumables to allow the lower economic bracket to retain more of their income that will not work?
I believe prostitution is already legal in some places.
I used to be against the legalization of prostitution, until I realized that perhaps some people are unable to find someone to have a sexual relationship with and sex is a natural urge which needs to be fulfilled.
At least legalizing it might allow such people to have these needs met without having to consort with the criminal element to do so.
Maybe requiring a prescription and putting it under some kind of health legislation might help as well.
Certainly if we can legalize the killing of unborn babies under the guise of health issues, prostitution is a minor use\misuse of our medical system.
This would be a first.What would you do go to your DR and ask for a prescription for sex?
Many adult sex offenders simply lack fully adult peer relationships . They've never HAD sex with someone they're equal with, because they don't FEEL equal to anyone but someone younger.
Humans are sexual beings, and the ability to engage in a healthy, non-deviant, adult sexual relationship should not be discouraged.
Most people think of sex offenders as crazy men sitting around masturbating constantly... wouldn't you feel better if those men were expending their energy with a woman who could satisfy their needs, in both a physical and emotionally therapeutic sense?
Your analogies between sex trade occupations and other occupations such as sweatshops, custodial services, and so on, breaks down because those who are forced into labor in those fields are not repeatedly raped to make them feel worthless and completely degraded. The fact is the child prostitution feeds the adult sex trade. The fact also is that demand exceeds supply, creating incentives for lawbreakers to continue to exploit children and young women. Legalizing prostitution will not diminish the demand and may increase it.
Please don't think that the only thing that could POSSIBLY degrade a person is rape .
Being told that you're stupid, worthless, that your family abandoned you, that you're alone... all of these things are just as degrading as being raped. And sweat-shop laborers are routinely told such things, along with "If you complain, you're the illegal one", "I'll just have you deported," et cetera. The feeling of hopelessness, of having nobody to whom you can turn... THAT is the outcome. It doesn't matter if the action bringing about that outcome is verbal abuse , physical abuse, or sexual abuse .
Human trafficking to *FORCE* an individual into ANY occupation, be it a sex trade or not, is degrading.
Words hurt for much longer than sticks and stones. Prostitution, in some (possibly sad) circumstances, is one thing that restores an individual's faith in themselves and in the worth they have as a human being. I don't advocate child prostitution under the guise of "therapy", but I do absolutely advocate adults making the free choice to become sex-industry workers .
If you dislike prostitution, then you don't have to participate.
As long as prostitution remains illegal women will have little to no legal protection. Bring it out into the open so that it can be regulated (and taxed).