Can Catholics Vote For Pro-Choice Politicians?

Can Catholics Vote For Pro-Choice Politicians?

“They don’t vote as a block anymore.” These words were recently spoken by Monsignor Joseph Rebman about Catholic voters. Once a powerful demographic, Catholics today are bitterly divided over whether it is acceptable to vote for pro-choice politicians. Many Catholics are proudly progressive, but others insist that abortion is non-negotiable. What are the spiritual implications of a Catholic vote?

Next question in Roe v. Wade

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 5 Comments on this Argument. See all 70 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Argument
Making Abortion Illegal is not the Only Option
- From Chris Korzen
Yes Side
By Chris Korzen - Executive Director, Catholics United

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • BME
    Choosing to Do Good is Not Enough

    The statement issued yesterday by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which is available at usccb.org, expressly rejects Mr. Korzen's argument that as long as we think that a candidate will help the poor, we can ignore the candidate's appalling record on abortion.

    The Bishop's statement makes clear that Catholics must try to help the poor, but must always fight against the intrinsic evil of abortion.

    - BMEUS October 22, 2008 11:19AM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • DominicSavio
    If there is nothing wrong with abortion....

    I have one simple question:
    If there is nothing wrong with abortion, then why do we need to reduce its use? The Democratic Party has time and again defended not only the right to abortion, or rather the right to choose as they state, but have stated that abortion is not murder, but just another medical procedure.

    If this is true, then why all the work to reduce abortions? If they truly believe that there is nothing wrong with it, what is the purpose of this new dedication to reduction?

    I think it is just an attempt to placate voters and appease certain members while still raking the millions of pro-abortion donor dollars and glowing endorsements from the major abortion providers and backers.

    - DominicSavioUS October 25, 2008 10:26PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • TwentySomethingAndSmiling
      A thought...

      He mentioned that many people who lobby for the pro-choice movement tend to be extremists, as is the pro-life movement. But most of us are somewhere in the middle of these extremist views. Just because the pro-life movement states that it is "just a medical procedure", doesn't make it any less heart-wrenching to those who get an abortion, therefore the pro-choice movement tries to reduce them.

      - TwentySomethingAndSmilingUS October 29, 2008 12:27PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Uncommitted

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Debra C
    Continued Abortion is not an Option

    You are absolutely correct that making abortion illegal is not the only option. In fact, I would argue that it must not be. If we were simply to overturn Roe v. Wade and immediately pass a no exceptions federal ban on abortions now, the results would predictably look much like the days of Prohibition with disastrous results for countless women and babies. However, though I freely admit this point, to use this as a means of justifying continued unrestricted legal abortion is a cop out. As Catholics, our end goal should be no more abortions.

    Since we agree that simply passing legislation is not enough, then we have our work cut out for us. First, it is important for each of us to understand that this fight is not about women's rights as the pro choice advocates claim. Rather it is about whether or not a human life, even an unborn one, is deserving of protection as a person under the law. To deny one group or another personhood, as Roe v. Wade does the unborn child, means they can be disposed of with impunity for any reason and by any means whatsoever. Allowing this to continue sets a dangerous precedent by which many people may be deemed nonpersons and disposed of. It is a person's humanity, not his utility, that should guarantee rights and protection under the law. These are the very principles our nation was founded on. It can be found clearly stated in the opening paragraph of the Declaration of Independence.

    This said, one must also be concerned for these mothers who find themselves in desperate situations which might drive them to choose abortion. Obviously, as a nation we have failed these women. We have not provided them adequate support. That must change. If we are to turn the tide against abortion, these women need compassionate support, adequate health care, and options that enable them to continue their lives in dignity without putting their child to death. Many Democrats and Republicans, pro choice and pro life activists alike, have been working to engage in these kinds of services. However, this alone is also not enough.

    So long as we deny the unborn child personhood, the unmitigated slaughter will continue, and we as a nation are guilty of grave sin. These little lives deserve the same protection as the rest of us, and it is here in the fight against abortion that we have the opportunity to guarantee the protection of law to all human beings, be they big or small, healthy or disabled, young or old. Anything less leaves us at the whim of judges, politicians, or the popular vote to decide who lives and who should die, a breeding ground for the likes of Hitler's Germany where large groups of people were targeted because of race, religion, genetic abnormality, and even such simple things as a less desirable hair and eye color. This cannot be allowed. We protect the lives of our pets, even stray animals, but offer nothing for our own children. Though other options can and even must be pursued, abortion must be made illegal, just as it is illegal to murder, to steal from others, or to beat and torture another because you disagree with his ideas. Directly causing his death is most certainly more a violation of the child's rights than carrying the baby to term could ever be for his mother.

    - Debra CUS October 27, 2008 11:41AM

    Reply to this Recommend (2) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • countryboy
    why make it illegal

    No not for now it's need.

    - countryboyUS July 26, 2009 12:23AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Can Catholics Vote Pro Choice?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • The American Papist
    Thomas Peters, M.A., is a young Catholic currently studying and working in Washington DC. He runs the popular blog American Papist.

    Thomas has most recently... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.