Should Animals Have the Same Rights as People?

Should Animals Have the Same Rights as People?

Last year Leona Helmsley left $12 million to her dog, Trouble, setting off a heated courtroom battle. California just passed a proposition that says farm animals must be humanely caged. The legal line between humans and animals is blurring further everyday. When it comes to "animal rights," should your cocker spaniel be entitled to the same freedoms and protections as your kid?

Next question in Animal Rights

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 2 Comments on this Argument. See all 187 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Argument
Last Thoughts on Animals, Computers and Human Minds
- From Tibor Machan
Animal Rights Don't Exist Side
By Tibor Machan - Author/Journalist/Professor

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • sor666
    Does one have to be a "thinking being" to have rights?

    The right to be free from suffering and pain, the right to be free from enslavement, the right to reproduce and take care of one's offspring, the right to have access to an environment which supports ones basic needs for food , water, shelter etc- none of these rights are in any way conditonal on the subject being a 'thinking being', but only on the subject being a 'living' being with a sufficently complex nervous system.

    - sor666AU May 6, 2009 4:23AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • sor666
    sor666

    It is absurd to compare computers to animals and is very much in the 17th century tradition, when animals were considered to possess no free will, but were automatons- hence it was considered valid to vivisect them. Animals are alive, machines are not alive- this is the fundamental difference.

    - sor666AU May 6, 2009 4:33AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Related Debates
"That Depends on Your Worldview" Paul J Fitzgerald
"Animal Rights Don't Exist" Tibor Machan
"Similar Rights for Animals" Bob Torres
"Making Sense of Animal Rights" Eric Prescott
Most Objections

Do Animals Have the Same Rights as People?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Eric Prescott
    Filmmaker Eric Prescott's animal rights blog, ananimalfriendlylife.com, was launched initially to comment on animal issues in the media, but has evolved into a... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.