Should We Recycle?

Should We Recycle?

From the time when you were a small child, you were probably taught the virtues of recycling: paper, plastic, aluminum; you did your part to save the Earth. But a growing number of voices are concerned that recycling may harm the environment by expending more resources than simple trash. Before you decide whether to toss that plastic bottle in the blue bin, what should you consider?

Next question in Society

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 3 Comments on this Argument. See all 26 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Argument
Landfills Pose Minimal Risks, Despite Claims to the Contrary
- From CEI
No Side
By Competitive Enterprise Institute - From Economy to Ecology

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Naumadd
    Misdirection ...

    Certainly, many consumers fear the health risks of our landfills, however, health risk is only a minor consideration in the issue of recycling. The primary issue is the reuse of finite resources. Even if the landfills were 100% safe to the environment, the issue of dwindling finite resources would remain.

    I believe most consumers are concerned about the raping of what beauty is left of our natural environment for the sake of their own lives and the lives of their children.

    No one I've spoke to on the issues of recycling and the environment are primarily concerned over the health risks of landfills. This argument is misdirection.

    - NaumaddUS September 12, 2008 4:12PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • fire1
    In the first instance...

    I am disinclined to agree with an EPA assessment (from 1990 no less) simply because they are heavily invested in the landfill approval process. Second, the risk associated with landfills is not the cancer exposure they present. It is the contamination of underground aquifers rendering drinking water unpotable. Landfill membranes all leak eventually. Landfills are nothing less than mine tailings left to poison the future.

    And yes, they are a wealth of resources buried. When future anthropologists of the next species colonizing the Earth dig up our landfill they will conclude that we were a frivolous race indeed to destroy our own water supply with buried wealth caches that we could not longer recover, especially when they were needed to save our species from extinction.

    - fire1US September 14, 2008 5:43PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Michael Glass
    Haven't you heard of Love Canal?

    Minimal risks? Read about the tragedy of Love Canal at

    http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/lovecanal/01.htm

    Read even more about it at

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Canal

    There was no 'minimal risk' for the former residents of Love Canal. The cost to the public has been enormous.

    - Michael GlassAU November 15, 2008 5:59AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Should We Recycle?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.