Experts and users discuss green living, society: Landfills Pose Minimal Risks, Despite Claims to the Contrary
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Landfills Pose Minimal Risks, Despite Claims to the Contrary
- From CEI
By Competitive Enterprise Institute - From Economy to Ecology
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Misdirection ...
Certainly, many consumers fear the health risks of our landfills, however, health risk is only a minor consideration in the issue of recycling. The primary issue is the reuse of finite resources. Even if the landfills were 100% safe to the environment, the issue of dwindling finite resources would remain.
I believe most consumers are concerned about the raping of what beauty is left of our natural environment for the sake of their own lives and the lives of their children.
No one I've spoke to on the issues of recycling and the environment are primarily concerned over the health risks of landfills. This argument is misdirection.
- Naumadd
September 12, 2008 4:12PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
In the first instance...
I am disinclined to agree with an EPA assessment (from 1990 no less) simply because they are heavily invested in the landfill approval process. Second, the risk associated with landfills is not the cancer exposure they present. It is the contamination of underground aquifers rendering drinking water unpotable. Landfill membranes all leak eventually. Landfills are nothing less than mine tailings left to poison the future.
And yes, they are a wealth of resources buried. When future anthropologists of the next species colonizing the Earth dig up our landfill they will conclude that we were a frivolous race indeed to destroy our own water supply with buried wealth caches that we could not longer recover, especially when they were needed to save our species from extinction.
- fire1
September 14, 2008 5:43PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Haven't you heard of Love Canal?
Minimal risks? Read about the tragedy of Love Canal at
http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/lovecanal/01.htm
Read even more about it at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Canal
There was no 'minimal risk' for the former residents of Love Canal. The cost to the public has been enormous.
- Michael Glass
November 15, 2008 5:59AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.