It's Peddled as Science

you have such books written as, THE CONSIPIRACY OF IGNORANCE, by Martin Gross. Because the school system only teaches evolution the children attending that school will always be dumber and less intelligent than any other school that promotes spiritual growth and truth. Truth is probably the best factor in determining intelligence and one cannot have it with Gd! So that is why, in many peoples opinions, including my own, that we have this:
1. A statement by Dr. James Conant in 1960's,a quote in reference to the Education establishment ( public school) he called it a "CLOSED ALLIANCE" and little did he know just how much of a corrupt alliance it would become in the years ahead.
2. Apparently one of the sad consequences of such a corrupted alliance is that our kids are dumber and we have to have as much as 45% of PHD's are given to non- Americans each year in our country, which our governement calls, NON-RESIDENT ALIENS, according to the book, Conspiracy of Ignorance.
3.June 1999,the chairman of the Federal Reserve board, Alan Greenspan, warned that the poor state of public school education would endanger its constitution , that being a people capable of maintaining its prosperity.
4.In Massachusetts, April 1998 teachers where tested, all of whom had received bachelors of education, and 3 out of every 5 flunked! And that was being able to write a gramatically correct sentence.
5. And sadest of all the book exposes a national crisis when it showed that at a national math test, 60% of American students could not show how to get an average number from 5 numbers provided.
AND THE BOTTOM LINE IS THE TEACHERS AND THEIR ASSOCIATIONS AND UNIONS ARE IN GREAT NEED OF HIGHER EDUCATION THEMSELVES. PS INCLUDING CREATIONISM AS A N OPTION AND STOPPING HYPNOSIS ON STUDENTS WOULD BRING UP THEIR IQ'S IMMEDIATELY! My opinion.

(read in the computer voice of the Starship Enterprise)
Science is logic. God is not logic even though He created logic. He cannot be part of logic that would
be illogical.
Whats really illogical is when the study of science excludes God because you don't want him to exist. We sit in the middle and look both ways into infinity at a most wondrous universe and argue
about what is or is not science. If your science has no room for God then your science is too small.
Evolution and billions and billions of years of hit or miss chance to get a finger that flexes and contracts to pick up a penny. The evolution of music, why?
You guys deserve to have some maniacal communist take over our country and force you stop all experiments and study only what he says you can. (Oh my)

Richard Dawkins and Victor Stenger argue that the existence of a creative super-intelligence or God are scientific questions.

"the presence or absence of a creative super-intelligence is unequivocally a scientific question." - The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, p. 58-59.

"The process I will follow is the scientific method of hypothesis testing. The existence of God will be taken as a scientific hypothesis and the consequences of that hypothesis searched for in objective observations of the world around us. Various models will be assumed in which God has specific attributes that can be tested empirically. That is, if a God with such attributes exists, certain phenomena should be observable." - God: The Failed Hypothesis by Victor Stenger, p. 17-18.

Do these scientists not understand the difference between science and non-science?

As a final blow to the Discovery Institute's attempts to get Intelligent Design into the Catholic 'door', the church announced an evolution congress which failed to invited creationists, and intelligent design

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0804713.htm

The Congress, titled "Biological Evolution: Facts and Theories. A Critical Appraisal 150 years after 'The Origin of Species'" is scheduled for March 3-7, 2009 in Rome and is organized by "[t]he Pontifical Council for Culture, Rome's Pontifical Gregorian University and the University of Notre Dame in Indiana [who] are organizing an international conference in Rome March 3-7 as one of a series of events marking the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin's "The Origin of Species."

The reason for rejection?

--
He said arguments "that cannot be critically defined as being science, or philosophy or theology did not seem feasible to include in a dialogue at this level and, therefore, for this reason we did not think to invite" supporters of creationism and intelligent design.
--

It seems to me that the Catholic church has come to understand that intelligent design fails to contribute either to science or to theology in a manner fruitful to be discussed.