Homosexuals Ultimately Want Government Approval of Their Lifestyle
Homosexuals argue that the state of California should permit any two consenting adults who love each other — regardless of gender — to get married. Yet plenty of lifestyles are sanctioned by neither federal nor state governments.
Polygamous and incestuous marriages, even among consenting adults, are prohibited pretty much everywhere, as is pedophilia. Nor do states give recognition to couples involved in “open" or "swinging" relationships, in which partners, married or otherwise, are free to date other people.
Homosexual relationships were once proscribable as well — some states even made such relationships criminal. Still, even the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, which rendered state sodomy laws unconstitutional, “does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexuals seek to enter.” Lawrence merely states that gays’ “right to liberty … gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without interference from the government.” Currently, only one state outside of California , Massachusetts , recognizes homosexual marriages, though four others — Connecticut , New Hampshire , New Jersey and Vermont — allow same-sex “civil unions.”
Though not required to, California has already given formal recognition to same-sex relationships by permitting “domestic partnerships,” which confer upon registered homosexual couples the same rights, benefits and responsibilities that married heterosexual couples receive. In gays’ view, however, “domestic partnerships” are inherently unequal to “marriages” because they do not go by the same name.
“Different” does not necessarily mean “unequal.” Few would argue that people of different genders, races, religions, or political parties are unequal despite the different labels placed on them. Likewise, the term “domestic partnership” does not necessarily imply that homosexual unions are unequal to the “marriages” heterosexuals enjoy, especially since domestic partners in California enjoy all the same rights and privileges that married couples do. The unions simply go by different names.
"Separate" does not necessarily mean "unequal" in this case.

Domestic Partnership is not equal to marriage: No joint filing of taxes , no right to even visit your partner in ICU because you are not family, no right to chose medical treatment for your partner, no right to bury your partner as you see fit, no right to your joint investments with your partner (the family takes it), no insurance benefits from your employer for your partner.
Hetro married couples I challenge you to file single taxes, you'll be shocked at the amount.
But that's ok we are only queers.
Stop h8ing and get current.
Of course they want government approval. Why shouldn't they? Why do you insist on making homosexuals second class citizens? Take a look at the history of the Quakers in England. Tell me, what is the difference in your view vs. Englands views of the Quakers? Why is your religious heart so dark and shut off?
Its about legal rights...hospital visitation, getting into an ambulance, tax incentives. These are not the same for domestic partners. Its exactly like having separate "but equal" drinking fountains or restrooms--or sitting in the back of the bus.
Religions don't have to bless these unions, however its up to the government of the people to treat people fairly and bestow the same rights.