Should We Eat Meat?

Should We Eat Meat?

Thanksgiving arrives every year with a heated debate over how to best cook that plump and juicy turkey. But the idea of a tofu turkey (also known as a “tofurkey”) has gone from a joke a couple years ago to a reality for many. While vegetarianism has been practiced for over a thousand years in some countries, it is a relatively new concept in the West. And so, with the question cropping up more and more often, should we eat meat?

Next question in Animal Rights

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 4 Comments on this Argument. See all 665 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Argument
Have a Helping of Kangaroo
- From Reason Foundation
Yes Side
By Reason Foundation - Free Minds and Free Markets

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Santa Cruz Mom
    The evidence for this argument isn't very credible

    The paper "food miles undermined" declares itself at the beginning - it was written to try to convince environmentally consicous consumers in the EU to buy New Zealand meat and produce. There is no supporting evidence given for the findings. Who commissioned the report? What are the credentials of the people who wrote the report? The argument that a dozen hothouse apples might produce more carbon emissions than a slice of bacon is based on a paper without any credentials and the faulty assumption that a person who refrains from eating meat for environmental reasons would then turn around and eat produce grown in a hot house half way around the world.

    - Santa Cruz MomUS July 13, 2008 6:12PM

    Reply to this Recommend (2) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Phat P
    The Meat Delusion

    I think your whole argument is summed up in your dozen apples vs a slice of bacon comparison. It is dishonest and laughable. You can't grow just one slice of bacon and the amount of resources it takes to raise a pig, slaughter it and transport him or her to a market or restaurant is much more damaging to the environment than even 100 apples. The only thing more damaging is this argument you've laid out about eating meat here.

    - Phat PUS August 6, 2008 1:32AM

    Reply to this Recommend (4) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • ElaineVigneault
    Eat Accordingly - a checklist

    "Be specific about your concerns and eat accordingly, rather than imposing a blanket ban."
    I agree that this is a logical way to approach the issue.

    For anyone whose concerns include...
    1. animal welfare,
    2. human health and wellness,
    3. workers rights and safety,
    4. crime and violence,
    5. small farmers and the economy, or
    6. the environment
    ...should reduce their meat consumption. Go vegetarian or vegan part-time.

    For anyone whose concerns include...
    1. the above, and/or,
    2. animal rights
    ...should go vegan.

    Remember, it's not an either/or decision.
    You can go vegan AND eat organic, local, sustainable.

    - ElaineVigneaultUS September 1, 2008 8:55PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Regarding Objection
Meat Isn’t Green & Greenpeace Doesn’t Advocate Eating Kangaroo
- From PETA
No Side
By PETA - People for Ethical Treatment of Animals

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • richardsonkr
    So hunting is green?

    If raising animals for food is so harmful, hunting for meat is obviously the answer. A pound of beef may require 2500 gallons of water, and wheat may require only 25, but wild venison does not need to be provided water. If anything, shooting the deer ends the menace of some creature eating our food, drinking our water, and farting greenhouse gasses. Obviously, I am being a smart ass. Your argument is not against meat, it is against agriculture in general. Since global warming doesn't exist and agriculture is required for sustained human population, human specialization, and civilization in general, I would say that it is worth the cost.

    - richardsonkrUS January 24, 2009 11:32PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Should We Eat Meat?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Consumer Freedom
    The Center for Consumer Freedom is a nonprofit organization devoted to promoting personal responsibility and protecting consumer choices. We believe that the... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.