Experts and users discuss meat, animal rights, food and nutrition: Have a Helping of Kangaroo
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Have a Helping of Kangaroo
- From Reason Foundation
By Reason Foundation - Free Minds and Free Markets
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
The evidence for this argument isn't very credible
The paper "food miles undermined" declares itself at the beginning - it was written to try to convince environmentally consicous consumers in the EU to buy New Zealand meat and produce. There is no supporting evidence given for the findings. Who commissioned the report? What are the credentials of the people who wrote the report? The argument that a dozen hothouse apples might produce more carbon emissions than a slice of bacon is based on a paper without any credentials and the faulty assumption that a person who refrains from eating meat for environmental reasons would then turn around and eat produce grown in a hot house half way around the world.
- Santa Cruz Mom
July 13, 2008 6:12PM
Reply to this Recommend (2)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
The Meat Delusion
I think your whole argument is summed up in your dozen apples vs a slice of bacon comparison. It is dishonest and laughable. You can't grow just one slice of bacon and the amount of resources it takes to raise a pig, slaughter it and transport him or her to a market or restaurant is much more damaging to the environment than even 100 apples. The only thing more damaging is this argument you've laid out about eating meat here.
- Phat P
August 6, 2008 1:32AM
Reply to this Recommend (4)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Eat Accordingly - a checklist
"Be specific about your concerns and eat accordingly, rather than imposing a blanket ban."
I agree that this is a logical way to approach the issue.
For anyone whose concerns include...
1. animal welfare,
2. human health and wellness,
3. workers rights and safety,
4. crime and violence,
5. small farmers and the economy, or
6. the environment
...should reduce their meat consumption. Go vegetarian or vegan part-time.
For anyone whose concerns include...
1. the above, and/or,
2. animal rights
...should go vegan.
Remember, it's not an either/or decision.
You can go vegan AND eat organic, local, sustainable.
- ElaineVigneault
September 1, 2008 8:55PM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.