Government Conceded That Vaccines Triggered Regression Into Autism
Until very recently we have been told by the Institutes of Medicine, that there is no causal link to vaccines and autism. However, recently the government’s vaccine court conceded the case of Hannah Poling, admitting that vaccines triggered her regression into autism by exacerbating mitochondrial dysfunction.
According to Scott Bono, National Autism Association chairman, the CDC has conducted no safety testing on the possible harmful effects of simultaneously administering multiple vaccines to infants, and has steadfastly refused to state a preference for mercury-free vaccines to be given to children and pregnant women.
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter
OV Social
I am dismayed that Dr. Hirani is listed as an expert. side from her MD and MPH, her only expertise is a seeming concurrence with the reams of false studies and bogus biomedical interventions proposed by DAN and the Autism Anarchists. Her website is a clear departure from evidence based medicine and her misstatement of the evidence is a strong indicator of someone whose emotional attachment has overcome her rational thinking.
The US Gvmt have not said that vaccines triggered a regression into autism. If you believe this to be true, please could you provide a link to this statement.
What I believe you will find is that HHS stated:
"In sum, DVIC has concluded that the facts of this case meet the statutory criteria for demonstrating that the vaccinations CHILD received on July 19, 2000, significantly aggravated an underlying mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with features of autism spectrum disorder."
1) encephalopathy is not autism
2) 'features of autism spectrum disorder' does not equate to 'diagnosis of autism'.
It is clear that Ms Poling was vaccine injured. It is also clear that she is autistic. What is also clear from both this document and the Case Study is that her vaccines did not cause her autism.
Please see: http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=1084
Ultimately, where the snake- oil industry lies with statistics, a new world order of mind control and market profiteering steal the day. Just make the statistics so complexly-evasive and so covered-up, that a normal person might even assume all is well. Well, until their child is utterly ruined and their family plans are ruined. Is this the world you want? Is it a new covert form of eugenics? A means to remove particular breeder-genes from humans?
“Just make the statistics so complexly-evasive and so covered-up, that a normal person might even assume all is well.”
In what way are the statistics ‘complexly-evasive and so covered up’? They seem quite readable to me.
“Is this the world you want? Is it a new covert form of eugenics? A means to remove particular breeder-genes from humans? “
Do you have any evidence to support this? Or is this more ‘second gunman’ style conspiracy theorizing?
Mr Brook:
Granted, it is easy to dismiss persons who are outside the ivory towers. Perhaps that is final in it's self.
"In what way are the statistics ‘complexly-evasive and so covered up’? They seem quite readable to me."
The "Tower Of Babel" likewise is readable and yet it is indeed logical that readers are found on all sides of those issues. In this manner, i could agree with you sir.
“Is this the world you want? Is it a new covert form of eugenics? A means to remove particular breeder-genes from humans? “
Do you have any evidence to support this? Or is this more ‘second gunman’ style conspiracy theorizing?
Evidence?-- I certainly have many remarkable leads available to study, with regard to that statement. Thanks to the internet ! Many of these leads have scholarly works supporting further, more comprehensive investigation. Do you collate and review all comprehensive evidence, sir? Do you sir, propose to dismiss similar-sounding, public interests?
With thanks for your comment.
"Granted, it is easy to dismiss persons who are outside the ivory towers."
Actually it is easy to dismiss persons who make claims but do not provide evidence to support their claims.
"Evidence?-- I certainly have many remarkable leads available to study, with regard to that statement. Thanks to the internet ! Many of these leads have scholarly works supporting further, more comprehensive investigation. Do you collate and review all comprehensive evidence, sir? Do you sir, propose to dismiss similar-sounding, public interests?"
Then cite so I can review and we can discuss.
Just because the government says that, it doesn't mean that it is true. I just think that the government cracked under the pressure of society for an answer regarding the Hanna Poling case. And as far as I'm concerned, mitochondrial dysfunction is a condition all its own, that has similar symptoms of autism. The big difference is, mitochondrial dysfunction can be cured, real autism can not.