God Established Seven-Day Week as Pattern for Mankind
If you think about it, an infinite Creator God could have created everything in no time. Why, then, did He take as long as six days? The answer is given in Exodus 20:11 . Here we find that God tells us that He deliberately took six days and rested for one as a pattern for mankind—and this is where the seven-day week comes from. The seven-day week has no basis for existing except from Scripture. If one believes that the days of creation are long periods of time, then the week becomes meaningless.
The Bible tells us that Adam was created on the sixth day. If he lived through day six and day seven, and then died when he was 930 years old as Scripture records, and if each of these days was a thousand or a million years, you have major problems! On the fourth day of creation ( Genesis 1:14-19 ), we are given the comparison of day to night, and days to years. If the word “day” doesn't mean an ordinary day, then the comparison of day to night and day to years becomes meaningless.
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter
OV Social
An impressive share, I simply given this onto a colleague who was doing just a little analysis on this. And he in truth bought me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I really feel strongly about it and love studying more on this topic. If potential, as you become expertise, would you thoughts updating your weblog with more particulars? It's highly useful for me. Huge thumb up for this blog put up! Celexa online pharmacy lave Norco Eland Viagra with dapoxetine sacrificer Buy daily cialis pills online donative
I believe that the 6-day Creation of the Universe as we know it today has to be taken literally, even though Scripture does say that one day in the eyes of the Heavenly Father is like a thousand years. The first verse in Gensis says that "God created the heavens and the earth," which means that yes, the Earth has been around for millions of years, a verification of rock samples and other geological data that concludes the Earth has been around for millions of years. At some point within those millions of years, God decided to transform a lifeless Earth into a life-giving planet while at the same time He was creating time, outer space, the galaxies, stars, our Milky Way and Solar System, the Earth's moon, the presence of evening, day, and night on Earth, and all of the living things to grow and roam on the planet. As the previous poster had mentioned, the significance of the 7-day week would be useless if we decided not to interpret literally the Genesis Creation story. If he did not take 7 literal days to create the Universe as we know it today, then He would have no reason to bless the seventh day and set it apart. Everything else in Scripture, I believe that we are free to interpret it as we wish. But if we are dealing with a highly-intelligent Being who can separate the waters of the Atlantic or Pacific Oceans at will, then why would we question or doubt that He could create our mortal Universe in six days flat?
Well once you accept the existence of an all powerful deity then anything is possible... The same can be said for invisible gnomes building everything.
However for those who do see no evidence for a divine being (or invisible gnomes) see no reason to presume that the world was created in six days... indeed the evidence is quite strongly pointing in another direction.
AIG doesn't believe the geological data. They believe the world is a little over 6,000 years old!!
There are some answers in there.
Why am I so distrustful of snakes?
AIG's got that.
What's the biggest I could build a boat without irritating G-d?
AIG's got that.
How old is the earth?
Mmmmmehhhh.
See, the 6000 year number is a calculation made by a guy named Usherr. I almost feel bad about criticizing it because it was a massive amount of time, effort and brilliance that the guy put into it. This was a labor of love. But we have to at least be consistent. They keep saying "Scientists could be wrong". Well...Bishop Usher could be wrong. Very, very wrong.
Usher got a bad rap. He wasn't trying to find out how old the world was, he wanted to compare the Bible chronology with other historical chronologies to see where the Bible fit into history. Some other literalist took it and decided the world was created in 4004BC and Usher got the blame.
If the seven-day week is relevant, shouldn't the names of the days be relevant as well? Specifically the days named after pagan Gods--Odin's day, Thor's Day, Freya's Day, etc. Would God have built a pattern of idolatry into something that significant?
Human beings added names to the days of week, they were originally and simply numbers. The first day, the second day, the third day, and so forth. No, God did not place elements of idolatry into His days (or anything else, for that matter). I believe that when people take out the supernatural aspect of this issue, then we might as well give all the credit to men, many of whom always seem to know more than our Heavenly Father. I say let's stop trying to rationalize everything in God's creations and allow Him some of the honor.
Why should we just stop? Why not keep trying to understand the universe? I could never imagine being satisfied with a 'God did it'.
There are some things human beings were not meant to understand because the God who created this Universe is a Being who is greater than all of His Creation. I am not here to argue Scripture on God because the Bible tells us that the man who lacks wisdom says that there is no God (Psalm 14, Verse 1). I believe that it's a good thing to want to know more about our Universe, but the Universe we need to focus on is our personal Universe, Planet Earth. We encounter galaxies of people every day, on the street, at work, in our neighborhoods, and on the streets and highways. Some of them are homeless, poor, needy, lonely, or just plain everyday people who could benefit from a smile or kind word and deed. The stars are thousands and millions of light years away, but many of the Earth's 7 billion people are only minutes away from us. Yes, God did create the Universe and more. He also allowed us the opportunity to live among other people, so that we could share ourselves with our fellow men and women, and make a difference in their lives. I will not deny the existence of a supernatural Being greater than myself, because none of us made the choice to be born. This was something that happened without our consent - I don't need to prove the existence of God because I am not here to split hairs with other people. But until we can definitely prove that God does not exist, then I would consider it useless to debate on the subject. As one preacher said: "The unbelievers don't believe in God until they find themselves in a disaster and at the brink of death." Death is such a powerful thing, that it has motivated such people to get down on their knees and pray to the very same God that they say they don't believe in! God is real - the proof is all over the Earth and around you, evening, morning, day and night.
What proof can you offer that right now we have reached the maximum limit of human knowledge? Why is it at this moment that nothing more should be known, why not 100 years ago, or 100 years from now?
"I am not here to argue Scripture on God because the Bible tells us that the man who lacks wisdom says that there is no God (Psalm 14, Verse 1)"
You do realize that quoting from the Bible only works when you are talking with Christians... and I've met more then a few people that I would count as wise who were not Christians.
"The unbelievers don't believe in God until they find themselves in a disaster and at the brink of death."
The old 'no atheists in foxholes' bit? I think that the Military Association of Atheists and Free Thinkers would disagree with you on that bit.
I am not an atheist, and have no reason to debate with anyone concerning an Eternal Being who is greater than any of us. "He who entertains a scoffer will do so to his sorrow, and the father of one who lacks wisdom has no joy (Proverbs 17:21)." You have your beliefs, and I have mine. I have given you my respect - therefore, we would never reach a common ground on the reality of the existence of God, which in my book, is a no-brainer.
Of all of AIG's silliness, I think this one is the winner.
All AiG is showing is that the author of one part of the Bible took the author of another part of the Bible literally, not that either one knew what they were talking about. What if the Hebrews had a seven day week and wrote the text to justify and sanctify existing practice?
AiG's argument is no more sophisticated than "I'm right because I think I'm right."