Eradicating Racism Will Take More Than Casting a Vote

Shanta Driver
Chairperson, The Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN)

The American people deserve a huge congratulations for, in their majority, overcoming the prejudice that has characterized all of American history and vote in their self interest.

The election of a progressive black president of the United States is a historic milestone in the struggle for equality. It signifies a victory of reason over irrational racist fears. But eradicating racism will take more than casting a vote.

Peddlers of “New Jim Crow” policies like Ward Connerly, who cloak racist attacks in the bogus language of “race-blindness,” will seek to use Obama's victory as a rationale to further dismantle integration and affirmative action programs. They will falsely claim that the measures which made it possible for a black man to become president of the United States are no longer necessary.

They could be aided by the fact that in order to assuage the fears of white voters, Obama has felt the need to present himself as the least angry black man in the world. In his Philadelphia speech on March 18, he seemed to call on black people – and by extension, other minority Americans, to limit their struggles to not challenge white privilege. If that advice is followed, the hope and promise of change will not be fulfilled.

Progressive change is only won when the collective social power of the oppressed is organized and mobilized. In 2006, the ‘sleeping giant’ awoke and millions of Latinas and Latinos took to the streets to demand immigrant rights and the end to their invisibility in American society. The whole character of American politics and race relations was altered by their action. The sense of possibility and power aroused by that movement made Obama’s long-shot bid for the Democratic nomination a reality.  

An Obama victory is a victory for the young activists who acted as the foot soldiers for hope and change. After his election, they must demand that President Obama be accountable to them. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Freedom Riders gave President Kennedy no “honeymoon”; rather, they saw his victory as the moment to press harder for their demands. Similarly, an Obama victory can empower the forces of racial progress in America – but only if we follow Dr. King’s example and build a new, independent civil rights movement.


Defender's picture

LOOKS like. Not THINKS like. Not "the one who understands American liberty."
Admittedly, the speaker was an inner-city elementary school student without much knowledge of history. He's too young to remember constitutionalist Alan Keyes running for president, or to know of Thomas Sowell, black conservative economist, or Dr. Walter Williams, black libertarian professor and author.
So I hope that little guy has many chances to vote for candidates male and female who not only look like him but think and act like Bill-of-Rights-believing, small-government real Americans.

call me Roy's picture

Martin Luther King is rolling in his grave. Why? Benjamin Todd Jealous is president and CEO of the NAACP and says Anthony “Van” Jones is a “National Treasure." While Van Jones may have left the White House under a cloud, the NAACP says that’s not his whole story. The group considers him a pioneering hero for the environment and civil rights — so much so that it awarded him one of its highest honors: an NAACP Image Award. It’s a move that stoked the fire from Jones critics. Jones resigned in September 2009 from his position on the Council on Environmental Quality, under a firestorm of criticism over a petition he had signed. The NAACP keeps saying he is the most misunderstood man. I'm trying to figure out exactly where he's misunderstood. Is he misunderstood because he's a 9/11 Truther? Is he misunderstood because he's a self avowed communist? Is he misunderstood because he is a guy who defended Mumia Abu Jamal, the cop killer? Let's see. Is he understood because he wants a revolution? I'm trying to figure out how he's misunderstood. How is he misunderstood? We know where Van Jones stands on Marx. The question I have now is: Where does the NAACP stand on Marx?Where does the "NEW" NAACP stand on the Black Panther party? Does the NAACP's timing seem strange considering the November election is just around the corner? The NAACP would never use "the race card" would they?

etanheller's picture

"An Obama victory is a victory for the young activists who acted as the foot soldiers for hope and change . After his election , they must demand that President Obama be accountable to them. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Freedom Riders gave President Kennedy no “honeymoon”; rather, they saw his victory as the moment to press harder for their demands."

This is disgusting. A president should not be some puppet for the "demands" of pressure groups within society . The only thing Obama should be "accountable to" is the law and the rights of the people.

We can only end racism if we end this kind of class/group-struggle thinking. Affirmative action is racism, because it defines people by their race and not by their abilities or personal character.

Obama's election is somewhat an indication that people are less negatively racist - less hateful or prejudiced against certain ethnic minorities - but that fact that people continue to advocate for "positive" racism in the form of affirmative action shows us that race is still a major factor in the progressive movement's way of thinking. To end racism we must dispel race entirely from the political and moral arena, and only judge people based on their character. To advocate for equal rights, as King did, is the best thing - but to believe that we need to use government force to identify people by ethnicity and act on that (positively or negatively) is racist. End racism!

DrEthiopia's picture

http://abesha.wordpress.com

In the wake of Obama’s presidential victory, African-Americans had finally had their ‘excuse crutch’ kicked right under them.

The U.S. had long been dubbed - The Land of Opportunity.

Generations have flooded to the U.S. from all corners of the planet; some seeking refuge, while others simply seeking a better education, a better opportunity and a better tomorrow.
One uniform belief that is shared by ALL is that the U.S. is the one place on earth where, dreams come true and all things are possible, if one perseveres and never quits.

Yet African-Americans are the (only) group of people that play a pivotal role in filling up, all-statistics-gloomy-and-disheartening.
The question, ‘who is to blame for African-American’s failings?’, has been open for debate for the longest, and frankly for no apparent reason, when, specially all the evidences pointed back squarely at African-American themselves.

Obama’s presidential victory is a momentous and watershed moment, and particularly for this reason - it has helped shut the coffin cover down on the “racism” argument.

It is also a vindication of the timeless creed, that - no matter who you are or where you come from, you can achieve anything, no matter how hard life might sometimes tests you.

Africans Hardly Blame, While African-Americans Enjoy Blaming

I am black, of African descent, and i have lived in the U.S. for almost a decade now.
I am what you may choose to call an immigrant. And under the “white man’s” microscope, me and my African-American brothers and sisters are one and the same - BLACKS, i.e.

When i speak of race relations (racism) in America, i mainly speak from my experience as a black man in America, and everything else second, (Like pride in oneself, resilience, lack of inferiority complex ETC.)

Am i a witness of racism in America? Absolutely.

Do I believe whites have an advantage over blacks? Umm . . . Ye - - -S.

But nothing to cry and moan about. Probably very minimal advantage and one, in my African eyes, i have a hard time to identify. And definitely not something that a black man couldn’t overcome with a bit of hard work and vigilance.

What African-Americans have is a crippling disease called - Laziness.

It is precisely a dangerous disease because it is the hardest to notice and one that hardly displays its symptoms in black-and-white. However, this laziness in the black community is one that has sipped through over time, and it was almost non-existent in the generations before. African-Americans are the descendants of slaves who were subjected to hard and back-breaking labor, and this laziness that is prevalent among today’s generations of African-Americans is one that defies scientific theories, in my view.

More African-Americans had finished high school and attended college in the 70’s than they do today.

In fact, the rate of an African-American in the 70’s graduating high school and college was the same as that of an Anglo-American

African Americans Need Only Look At Africans

Perhaps no evidence debunks the “racism”argument more than black Africans who come to the U.S. to lead a triumphant and prosperous life. For that matter, one could point out the success rate of ALL types of immigrants. But for argument sakes alone, i choose to compare Apples-to-Apples (Blacks to Blacks, in this case)

And for those who are reluctant to let go off the racism argument, I have one more news for you.

On the list of obstacles an African-American faces in today’s America, racism was recently listed 18th.

18th! Making racism a non-issue by default.

So Why Do Africans Succeed Where African-Americans Fail?

Hard work, education, accountability and responsibility. It doesn’t get any more uncomplicated than that, though some intelligentsia in the African-American community would like to complicate things.

These so-called intelligentsia in the black community are what i call those with, a-hang-over-from-the-civl-rights-era. They are still living in the 60’s and 70’s. They are still stuck in solving the puzzle that has been long solved.

In fact, Africans are faced with more challenges than any African-American ever could. Most Africans are not born wih a silver spoon in their mouth; they are usually faced with all sorts of problems when they first arrive in America (Challenges like learning a new system, a language barrier that takes years to break, in addition to all the other problems and obstacles African-Americans claim to face due to their oigmentation).
So tell me, who has it hard? The African or the African-American?

The inescapable fact remains, that there is no substitute to hard work and resilience, and the sooner the African-American intelligentsia of the civil rights era fess up, the better for African-Americans.

SocialistBetty's picture

That's... that's actually not so shocking. It's just saying that millions of Latin-Americans have much more of a right to illegally immigrate because there's not an ocean in between themselves and freedom. That's all. Every other abused and downtrodden individual living in Chad has less of a right to immigrate because they're not Latino. Because the only reason people look at illegal immigrants and say there's something wrong with this picture is because of skin colour. NOT the fact that illegal immigration is harmful. Yes, people don't like illegal immigrants because of their skin colour... that Must be it.

Racism will never end. There will always be people who Will see a skin colour. Racism will always exist. That's just the way it is.

So never stop fighting it where-ever and whenever it occurs.

selfish's picture

I think it's is quite possible that Obama and his policies that follow in time may promote racism. In fact we already went down the wrong path with civil rights - giving a certain group of people unearned advantages, rights over others. It is unfortunate that leaders of minorities do not fight for rights of the individuals but instead contradict themselves with a focus for the rights of a group, a collective. What we end up with is a mob, a savage tribe of people fighting other savage tribes for power. We may be going backward in America. If Obama wants to take the foot hold away from racism - eliminate civil rights...and PROTECT INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS!!! After all, all groups are made up of individuals ---and when you protect these rights to life, liberty and happiness, then you protect the rights of any type of individual regardless of color, ancestry, genetics, sex, etc...

dpasquella's picture

I find it absolutely disheartening to learn that there are many black voters who have based their choice of the candidates due to race. I’m sure many white people did the same, but in a goofy interview by Howard Stern’s staff, they went into Harlem, NY and asked African-Americans why they were voting for Obama. The results were disturbing. To think that some thought Sarah Palin was Obama’s running mate and how it was ok if taxes went up while Obama was in office raised huge red flags for me.

No doubt, this is a great achievement in history. The only thing that scares me is Obama’s following. I’ve never in my lifetime seen such a reaction towards a president getting elected – it was comparable to the reactions and behaviors of those who followed Hitler. And no, that isn’t an exaggeration in my opinion. As a Christian and with my beliefs that I stand firmly upon, I do think this election signifies the coming of end times. With eloquent words and deceiving promises, we found ourselves a leader who appeased people of both sides, red and blue, and this has startled many.

On the other side of the fence, you have white supremacists who are outraged by this. Racism will never end on both sides. I have been witnessing articles and debates even after the election, and it’s getting worse. I even found myself arguing with a black woman, because she only voted for Obama because of what her ancestors went through and she could not give me one intellectual reason why Obama was good for office, other than, “He’s black and has come so far!” Not a reason. We all have opportunities. Tell me you voted for him because you liked his politics, his plans for health care and his promise to lower taxes. Don’t give me ‘we’ve come so far’---yes you have and “yes you can”, but don’t base this election because of race.

That angers me.

GettinGwap's picture

I am black first off. It always gets me how they interview the least educated minorities on TV. They get the most ignorant people and I know it makes us look bad to other races. I understand what you are saying, but you can't look at one end of the spectrum and not the other. There were plenty of blacks who could've told you who his running mate was and other political subjects. And if for no other reason, more blacks are more into politics because we actually feel like we have representation for once. I know this is getting off subject, but a rapper, Nas, once said this in a song celebrating Obama running for president. He says, "Black history, black history, no president ever did sh*t for me." That's the way many blacks feel.

crackeddiamonds's picture

Sorry, but from all the data I have received it seems that blacks were NOT voting for Obama based solely on race.

First, let's look at my data:

There was an article in the Houston Chronicle that posed this question and the overwhelming majority of black people said that they were not voting for Obama merely because he's black. Yes, roughly 90 percent of blacks voted for Obama, but let's not forget that roughly 90 percent of blacks vote democratic every YEAR.

Secondly, on the night of the election a poll was taken by CNN (I believe). A small percentage of people admitted to race being a factor in their decision for president but among that percentage roughly 50 percent still voted for Obama and roughly 40 percent still voted for McCain. The conclusion reached by the man presenting the data was that even if race were a factor, it wasn't a very big one.

Now, let's look at YOUR data:

Maybe I'm being a bit pretentious here, but forgive me if I question the veracity and credibility of "a goofy interview by Howard Stern's staff" which takes place only in Harlem. Not to mention, he's going for entertaining, so he's only going to air the worst of answers given. This is NOT, by any stretch of the imagination, a scientific study.

You use as evidence the opinion of a black person you talked to. Well, blacks I talk to have given a whole litany of reasons for voting for Obama (none of them having to do with the color of his skin). I know a person who got into an Obama-McCain argument and she came out of it frustrated that she (being a McCain supporter) couldn't come up with a good reason to vote for McCain while the Obama supporter had a laundry list of reasons to vote for Obama.

Now, both you and I have encountered people with vastly contrasting approaches to the elections. So, whose conclusion do we go with? Yours or mine? The answer is NEITHER for we are both working with small and not very diverse samples (namely people we know and talk to in some particular region of the U.S.) You go to Vermont, you go to Mississippi. You go to the suburbs. You go to the ghetto. Get a good, diverse sampling of opinions and then tell me what's going on.

Maybe your most compelling data for this are these unnamed articles and debates, but without knowing exactly what you're talking about, I can't say.

Conclusion

My conclusion is that people on both sides sometimes vote on emotions and may not know much about their candidates. Voters in general are misinformed and can only give you an emotional response when their beliefs are challenged. But the truth is, one can come up with a compelling case for Obama or McCain with little effort, but I personally don't need to: I voted for Ron Paul.

I honestly understand your criticism of people who vote based on race. I just don't think the facts match this assumption. I think maybe for blacks his race effected the level of their enthusiasm. Rather than hearing the "lesser of two evils" voting method that most people go by, I am hearing something that borders on unbridled religious conviction when it comes to Obama, but again, I'm working with too small a sample to say if that's the general case.

Anti-Christ?

But you think he's the anti-christ? I know one of the major prophesies concerning the anti-christ is that he will bring peace to the Middle East and usher in a worldwide government. Yes, there was a worldwide positive reaction to this Presidential election like never before. And it would seem that his ethnicity will go a long way in solving the Middle East crisis. So, I could kind of see what you're saying, but just be careful. People tend to think that just because a president is charming, that means he's the Anti-Christ. I mean, that's Kennedy, Reagan, and Clinton.

But that's just me.

Oh, but to answer the question: Does an Obama victory end racism? To put it simply "no, but it helps."

hope I was civil

Sarlin's picture

I think we still have a few generations to go to fully stomp out racism. You have to remember that racism does not distinguish between the colors of skin. What I mean is that people of any race can be racist. David Duke and Louis Farrakhan are two examples of racists that come to mind. I think that those under 30 are less likely to be racist than those over. And as the new generation comes up and then raises their children, that generation will be even more color blind.

Some obstacles I see in our country to doing away with racism:

1. Hyphenated ethnic tags. African-American, Hispanic-American, Irish-American, Arab-American, etc. Now if someone was actually born in another country, moved to the U.S. and then became an American...that I can almost see. However, I think true rectification will come when we can all simply consider ourselves American and do away with labels.

2. Reparations. I think if there is a renewed push for slavery reparations that it will tear a rift in race relations so wide open that it will not heal for a century. Slavery was an atrocity, but there is no one alive that was a slave and there is no way to discern, accurately, what black persons actually had slaves in their family history and those that don't.

3. Education and self accountability. We need to get our black communities up and running. We need better education and self accountability. Barack Obama has spoken on this matter as well as others such as Bill Cosby. The likes of Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan need to be pushed aside by the black community as they've done nothing but profit from keeping black Americans down. The black community, as a whole, needs to take charge of their own destiny. I grew up in public housing and no one gave me a free hand-out. I worked my butt off to get out of that situation and get my education. That method applies to all Americans. Also, education on the part of white folks. Ignorance is typically the engine for distrust and hatred. When I hear a white person spew racial slurs, I think what an ignorant fool!

I'm sure I'm missing a few other issues, but those are some.

Cheers!

richardsonkr's picture

First off, I don't think racism will ever truly be stomped out so long as there are differences between us. It is human nature to distrust that which is different. Education combined with tolerance and continued exposure can help to mitigate racism, but it will always remain to some degree. I think that many of the points that Sarlin has put forward are excellent, and will reduce racial inequality, especially the third point, but it will never truly end. I disagee that doing away with ethnic tags would be a positive change. I believe that Political Correctness has been damaging to Free Speech and race relations. White people have become scared of black people not because they afraid of being mugged or assaulted, but because they afraid of doing or saying the wrong thing and being labeled as a racist, or worse, losing their job or seeing a lawsuit filed against them, and fear is never constructive. As for the actual question, I think that Barack Obama's candidacy and election have been a step in the opposite direction. Many blacks voted for Obama because of his race, and many people, of all colors, voted against Obama because of policy, and some found a new sense of distrust that was not there before. It could just be bitterness about losing the election, but it also could be Obama's affiliations with Reverend Wright and Louis Farrakhan, statements made by his wife, and statements made by himself in his writing, and fear that other prominent and educated members of the black community share some of these views and affiliations. Any time race is politicized it is not constructive, either to race relations or to the political system in general.

GreenLove's picture

It will take a while for racism to go away completely, but I would say that Obama's victory shows that we have come a long way in overcoming racism. True: there are still people that are racist, but the type of violent hate and restrictions to the livelihood of blacks in America that used to happen is thankfully long gone. Racism used to be the rule, now it is more of an exception.

1) I don't think that identifying someone's heritage is a bad thing. Doing away with ways to talk about race (African-American) doesn't solve any problems, but it can stop the dialog.

Reparations -- I'm not totally sure what to do about this one. Its true that the people who lived as slaves are dead and buried, but the legacy of those injustices does live on. If we lived in a society where the well-being of your parents had no bearing on your life and chances at future success, that would be one thing, but that's just not where we live. The fact that whites, in general, are richer and more prosperous than blacks is borne from the days of slavery. Eventually, those differences should go away on their own, but acknowledging that fact, and committing more resources to increasing economic opportunities (especially for children) could be a good thing.

I'm not sure what you mean saying that Jesse Jackson has profited from keeping black Americans down. How did he do that?

SocialistBetty's picture

Well then, before we go handing out reparations based on skin colour, I say we hand out reparations to women... the sex that has been mistreated by all races as a slave. For the most part!

GreenLove's picture

I would suggest getting the reparations from them. They're the most accessible men and they might even be sympathetic.

Where I eventually came down on the reparations thing was that there needs to be quality public education for everyone (not reparations). My concern was that if a quality education is necessary for a person to achieve in the US (legally) and that quality education was expensive we might end up with a permanent underclass in the US.

SocialistBetty's picture

I was joking! The thought that we should give reparations to only one group of people is ridiculous. Which isn't to say that I think the situations were ridiculous... not at all. There a many groups throughout history that have been abused and used.... women as a whole fit into this and since I am a woman it just seemed fitting. I haven't been used and abused (luckily), but women before me fought for rights and equality. And it's still a battle. There will always be men who consider women to be inferior, just as there will always be white people who don't like black people, black people who don't like Mexicans, women who don't like prettier women (again, a joke)....

While it's a great stride, I agree with someone else when they posted that Obama winning will actually serve to undermine the equality issues and Affirmative Action. Despite the fact that I think Obama brought the fact that racism is alive and kicking out from the closet it's been hiding in and working sereptitiously from (mainstream, of course).

Joe6Pack's picture

"Hyphenated ethnic tags..."
"I don't think that identifying someone's heritage is a bad thing..."
True, but it's usually used in the wrong context and breeds contempt.

I am an American citizen of Polish(3rd gen) and Italian(2nd gen) heritage.

I don't go aroung saying I'm a Polish-American or Italian-American...
...I am an American

or I should be using...
(continent)NorthAmerican-American vs actual born African-Americans
(country)UnitedStates-American vs actual born Mexican-Americans
...to be politically correct?

But actually everyone is really- (mixed ancestry)Mulatto-American...
...which shortened is "American", the melting pot of the world.

mjays's picture

Anyway, with all the mixes on the rise, this will be impossible to do. My bf's family line includes English, Hungarian, Austrian, Cherokee, Swedish...what would he write? My son is Italian, Croatian, French, Thai and Irish. What would he write?

GreenLove's picture

All citizens of US are American. If you are of Polish and Italian descent, you should feel free to acknowledge that (or not). There are some forms that have you optionally fill in stuff like that. There are some people who want to keep tabs on stuff like that. For example, if no one captured stats on people's race or heritage, we might never know if for example people with Italian ancestry are getting admitted to colleges at a lower percentage than without Italian ancestry with the same grades and standardized tests scores. That would be an important thing to know. With no way to measure racism, we have no idea whether its happening or not.

Joe6Pack's picture

RE: subject= "No mandates"
??? your reply appears to say "mandates required"

RE: "All citizens of US are American"
Then why is there so much hyphen this/hyphen that?
Appears to be an identity crisis, either American or a foreigner and just visiting?

RE: "some forms that have you optionally"
True - optional, not mandated

RE: "some people who want to keep tabs..."
"we might never know if..."
"would be an important thing to know..."

Why?
How about if these "stats" were completely done away with, then...
"with the same grades and standardized tests scores"
...would really mean something and the truly qualified would be selected
All it does is perpetuate the divide and make some citizens more equal than others.

For higher education-after meeting/exceeding entry scores,the only Q's should be:
Are you an American citizen?
Are you a resident of said state/county?
...which are used for tuition costs
Then can apply to 3rd party organizations for tuition assistance based on ethnicity and other criteria.
The schools are in business to educate their students for the betterment of society.

I've heard that the Obama campaign has "lots" of money leftover and it's being given as
bonus's to the staffers. Why not being given to/starting up 3rd party org for educational
opportunities of said individuals?

RE: "no way to measure racism"
Believe your confusing race/color of skin with ethnicity/heritage.
Just because I'm of Polish/Italian heritage... does not indicate the color of my skin
Racism/sexisim/etc is illegal and all stats pertaining to should also be.
===

This is all "needed" for equal opportunities argument...
I went to:
...a public grade school
...a public high school
...a public 2yr tech college on the GI bill
I'm now classified by the incoming administration as "rich" (based on some arbitrary
income amount)...

Now tell me how many others in this nation do not have the same opportunities that I had/did?

I spent my time and energy, as an individual, on working and getting an education...
...not mislead/deceived by the rhetoric that this race/heritage requires this and deserves that.
Each individual makes their own "bed".

Like the current automaker bailout debate...
...Temporary help is earned, not permanently blindly given

Joe6Pack's picture

Appears we have gotten of topic on this thread.

There as another discussion specific to this topic...
Society: "Do we still need affirmative action?"

Sarlin's picture

I just think by his (Jesse Jackson) encouragement to black people to blame their problems (always...discrimination definitely is real!) on others and not telling them to take responsibility for themselves...to pick themselves up and push forward regardless. In my humble opinion, he seemed to indicate through his words and actions to the black community that whites would one day make all their ills go away. When Barack Obama made a speech earlier this year telling the black community they needed to be accountable for themselves, Jesse Jackson was caught on tape saying of Barack 'that nigger needs his balls cut off!' (paraphrase, but pretty accurate).

I am so happy that the black community, and all Americans for that matter, have someone beyond Jesse Jackson to look to now to help heal the wounds of the past between us fellow Americans.

MrBook's picture

Though it is a good sign that racial relations are moving forward in the US this is not the 'final nail' for racism. There will ALWAYS be people out there willing to follow racist (or sexist, or any other form of ist) ideologies.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social

 

randomness