Experts and users discuss meat, animal rights, food and nutrition: Eating Animal Products has been Linked to a Host of Deadly Diseases
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Eating Animal Products has been Linked to a Host of Deadly Diseases
- From PETA
By PETA - People for Ethical Treatment of Animals
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Indulge - but only occasionally
I am neither a scientist nor a physician but I do believe from everything I have read on the subject, that eating meat in moderation, as with all other things, cannot really be harmful or have long-lasting negative health effects.
The artery-clogging effects most likely come from eating very large portions of fatty meats and not eating enough fruits, grains and vegetables. In addition, those who over indulge generally do not have other good health habits such as getting sufficient sleep and exercise which are known to contribute to better health.
In addition, there are certain B Vitamins and I imagine other nutrients which are not easily found in other foods. Those who abstain from eating meat and are healthier than the meat eaters, probably owe their better states of health to their healthier lifestyles in general and not simply because they avoid eating meat.
- redondo July 16, 2008 10:28PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
and...
You forgot that life will absolutely end in death. The problem with such scare tactics is that you forget to weigh the positive traits of the consumption of animals.
The most dramatic steps in the evolutionary chain on our branch of the tree tends to come from the introduction of complex proteins that were derived from animals. We are here today simply because we changed from herbivores to omnivores. Of course, it doesn't change the fact that we now face such things as heart disease, but your implication is that vegetarianism is not fraught with its own complications that have been teased out over time.
- sumwatt July 24, 2008 10:43AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Scavengers, not omni
We haven't had to eat the scavenger diet en mass since the agricultural revoltion... are you still evolutionarily speaking "that far behind?" Yes, sorry to have to break it to you but we evolved a long time ago. Some societies have been vegetarian for thousands of years already... why hold on so tightly to something so destructive? I know you didn't plan to be like this but here you are, you can let go now.
Not critters need to die for you in particular, yes you, you don't have to eat another animal, egg, or any derivative. What would you be fighting for? Why?
- M3house
August 15, 2008 1:01PM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.