Should English be the 'Official' Language of the U.S.?

Should English be the 'Official' Language of the U.S.?

Just how diverse is America? For starters, millions of people speak a language other than English (more than 300 different languages are spoken in the U.S.). In an effort to create a linguistically uniform nation, some have proposed such laws as having English-only ballots. Do these measures help America keep its identity or end up doing more harm than good?

Next question in Politics

  • “No”
  • No Objections Yet

MALDEF

Congress Should Prioritize English Learning, Not English-only

MALDEF

English Language Learners want to learn English but are too often hampered in their efforts to achieve full proficiency.  English-only and Official English laws do nothing constructive to advance the important goal of English proficiency.

For ELL students in grades K-12, two-thirds of whom are native-born U.S. citizens, poor instruction denies them the tools to gain the language skills necessary to participate fully in the American economy and society.  There is ample evidence of the challenges these students face: Since 1975, at least 24 successful education discrimination cases have been brought on behalf of ELL students in 15 states.

With limited opportunities to learn English, ELL students face particularly poor outcomes.  The progress of these students is marked by failing graduation tests and high school drop out rates that are higher than classmates who are fluent in English.  It is critical that we improve instruction for these students to help them learn English, not penalize them for the poor quality of instruction that denies them the opportunity to learn the language well.

Adults who seek ESL classes also face an acute shortage of high-quality English-acquisition programs, which are too few and too often oversubscribed.  A June 2006 study by Dr. James Tucker for the NALEO Educational Fund surveyed the demand for and availability of adult ESL programs nationwide, and found tremendous unmet need.

Providing real opportunities to learn English is the most efficient and effective means of fostering English proficiency.  By contrast, English-only and Official English proposals do nothing to eradicate the barriers described or to help ELLs achieve fluency.  Instead, they compromise the health, safety, and well-being of not only ELLs, but of the communities in which they live.  English-only laws undermine the federal government’s ability to communicate with the public in situations where communication is urgently needed, thereby leaving all U.S. residents more vulnerable to danger. 

There are significant unmet needs in educating adults and children.  Legislators should focus their time and energy on English literacy education instead of English-only political posturing.

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

English an Official Language?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • MALDEF
    Through the years, MALDEF has been at the forefront of civil rights litigation, setting precedent in many cases and establishing new systems to elect officials... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.