Should Medical Marijuana be Federally Legalized?

Should Medical Marijuana be Federally Legalized?

Millions of Americans take prescription drugs to treat a plethora of illnesses and symptoms, but not all drugs are created equal. The question of whether or not to consider marijuana a viable medical treatment remains a hot button issue. In states like California, medical marijuana clubs have flourished despite their federal illegality. Should the federal government allow states to make their own decisions, or is marijuana nothing more than a dangerous narcotic?

Next question in Drug Law

  • “No”
  • “Objection”
  • “Objection”
Dr Voth

Cannabinoids May have Medicinal Use, but They Should Not be Smoked

Dr. Eric Voth

M.D., FACP

Supporting the use of synthetic or naturally occurring cannabinoids is not the same as supporting the use of marijuana. This position is most clearly researched and documented in the Institute of Medicine analysis on medical excuse marijuana and is summarized as follows:

Institute of Medicine Recommendations:

Recommendation 1: Research should continue into the physiological effects of synthetic and plant-derived cannabinoids and the natural function of cannabinoids found in the body. Because different cannabinoids appear to have different effects, cannabinoid research should include, but not be restricted to, effects attributable to THC alone.

Scientific data indicate the potential therapeutic value of cannabinoid drugs for pain relief, control of nausea and vomiting, and appetite stimulation . This value would be enhanced by a rapid onset of drug effect.

Recommendation  2: Clinical trials of cannabinoid drugs for  symptom management should be conducted with the goal of developing rapid-onset, reliable, and safe delivery systems.

The  psychological  effects  of cannabinoids are probably  important determinants of their potential therapeutic value. They can influence symptoms indirectly which could create false impressions of the drug effect or be beneficial as a form of adjunctive therapy.

Recommendation 3: Psychological effects of cannabinoids such as anxiety reduction and sedation, which can influence perceived medical benefits, should be evaluated in clinical trials.

Numerous studies suggest that marijuana smoke is an important risk factor in the development of respiratory  diseases, but the data that could conclusively  establish or refute this suspected link have not been collected.

Recommendation 4: Studies to define the individual health risks of smoking marijuana should be conducted, particularly among populations in which marijuana use is prevalent.

Because marijuana is a crude THC delivery system that also delivers harmful substances, smoked marijuana should generally not be recommended for medical use . Nonetheless, marijuana is widely used by certain patient groups, which raises both safety and efficacy issues.

Recommendation 5: Clinical trials of marijuana use for medical purposes should be conducted under the following limited circumstances: trials should involve only short-term marijuana use (less than six months); be conducted in patients with conditions for which there is reasonable expectation of efficacy; be approved by institutional review boards; and collect data about efficacy .

If there is any future for marijuana as a medicine, it lies in its isolated components, the cannabinoids and their synthetic derivatives. Isolated cannabinoids will provide more reliable effects than crude plant mixtures. Therefore, the purpose of clinical trials of smoked marijuana would not be to develop marijuana as a licensed drug, but such trials could be a first step towards the development of rapid-onset, non-smoked cannabinoid delivery systems.

 Recommendation 6: Short-term use of smoked marijuana (less than six months) for patients with debilitating symptoms (such as intractable pain or vomiting) must meet the following conditions :

  • failure of all approved medications to provide relief has been documented;

  • the symptoms can reasonably be expected to be relieved by rapid-onset cannabinoid drugs;

  • such treatment is administered under medical supervision in a manner that allows for assessment of treatment effectiveness;

  • and involves an oversight strategy comparable to an institutional review board process that could provide guidance within 24 hours of a submission by a physician to provide marijuana to a patient for a specified use.

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

"No" Dr Voth
"No" Drug Free America
"Yes" NORML
"Yes" Marijuana Policy Project
"Yes" ASA
Most Objections

Marijuana by Prescription?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Dr Voth
    Dr. Eric Voth is the chairman of the Institute on Global Drug Policy and the editor of the Journal on Global Drug Policy and Practice More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.