Should Cities Fund Needle Exchange Programs?

Should Cities Fund Needle Exchange Programs?

Nearly one-in-five new HIV cases are the result of drug users sharing dirty needles, an extrodinarily high number. Some cities have attempted to combat the epidemic by giving free clean needles to addicts in exchange for used ones. These programs are highly controversial in the U.S., with many insisting such programs encourage drug use and increase crime. Should your community be funding needle exchange programs?

Next question in Drug Law

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 2 Comments on this Argument. See all 88 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Argument
Basic Human Rights Include the Right to Health
- From Chicago Recovery Alliance
Yes Side
By Chicago Recovery Alliance - Positive Change

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Ricardo
    BASIC HUMAN RIGHT...SINCE WHEN?, SAYS WHO?

    Basic Human Rights can only apply to personal ID matters (any supra-structural category), and in any other context to non-rivalry of rights.
    That means, everybody have the right to fight for X. But anybody have the right, by condition or definition, to X.
    Whether needles or medical treatment automatic rights are a destruction of the rights of other social rules obedient citizens, and that is not justice.
    Social order can not survive on hostage taking menace.
    To appeal to the pandemia argument is exactly that, a hostage taking threat.
    In order to survive societies have condemned some attitudes and behaviors. One of them are drugs.
    To assign responsabilities is futile endeavour...nature or nurture debate has not been solved yet.
    The path of the middle on the drugs affair is legalizing drugs, a methadone program, and a compulsive restoring programm for drug adicts (of course, paid by adict with work while in treatment and after that...but the public is encouraged to support the cure financially -if it is their will-).

    - RicardoPA January 18, 2009 12:22PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Uncommitted

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • sunshiner424
    I call shanannigans!

    We have a basic human right to life. Not to health . This is because one human's rights end where another's begin. So one man has the right to live freely and does not have the right to take away another man's right to live. The entire meaning of the right to life is that another person cannot rightfully cause you death. Then we also have the right to property and an unstated right to our own time and energy . In other words, you cannot force me to work for you and you cannot take what I have earned.

    To say that everyone has a right to health is in itself a contradiction. Health sometimes relies on an expert and expensive treatments. Well, making a doctor serve someone is impinging on that man's rights so you have no right to do that. An addict having a right to needles is like saying everyone has a right to a car. I need a car because I can't get to work without one. Or I need a needle because I'll get sick without one. Simple solution: earn what you need by working for it. This is the only way large groups of people can live together peacefully. (Or communism but I'm not a big fan because there's not much freedom...) Every man deserves to use his time to help himself. A doctor does not become a doctor so that others can demand that he serves them.

    If my community decides that they all want to fund needles to drug addicts, I need to live somewhere else. People who mess up in life should get what they deserve.

    - sunshiner424US October 2, 2009 11:54AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Needle Exchange Programs?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • William Martin PhD
    William Martin (Ph.D, Harvard, 1969), is the Harry and Hazel Chavanne Emeritus Professor of Religion and Public Policy in the Department of Sociology at Rice.... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.