Our lives revolve around oil. Oil brings food to our stores, comprises the fibers in our carpets and makes the plastic in our DVDs. With demand so high it’s no wonder attention has turned to supply, with some advocating the U.S. lift the ban against drilling for oil off its coasts. Is offshore oil drilling a golden opportunity, or would it only create a tidal wave of disaster?
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content,
so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't
appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
1
1
1
0
0
0
Biweekly updates on new debates and experts
Please check your email to confirm your subscription.
© 2008 Opposing Views, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Opposing Views, Inc. is not responsible for the content posted on this website. Please view full disclaimer under Terms
2. Active Leases and Production Activity
- From Kenneth B Medlock III
By Kenneth B. Medlock III - Fellow in Energy Studies
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Use or lose.
65,000,000 acres are leased. Most are not active. No equipment is available to drill, no ships are available to move it and there is no more refinery capacity. Now is the time to develop new technologies for a more sustainable energy plan. We all know now speculation is the problem, not the supply. This is a fake arguement to continue the gauging of the American people. The oil companies want the rest to pad their assets. Make no mistake, if they get it they won't drill on it. Why would they?
- tjhawknest33
September 23, 2008 7:08PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Check your facts, and why exactly do you object?
To begin, the OCS lease statistics are available from the MMS at http://www.mms.gov/ld/PDFs/OCSstatusMap8e (3).pdf. You are significantly off the mark.
As for your objection, I do not understand why exactly you object. According to your argument, lifting the moratorium will not result in any drilling anyway. So, then, what does it matter if the moratorium is lifted?
Your claims about rigs, ships and refineries are short run arguments. Refinery capacity has been expanding, both internationally and domestically, precisely because demand for refined products has been growing. Rig lease rates have sky-rocketed over the last several years, making it profitable for rig owners to add capacity and they are doing so. (Rigs are not simply lying. As with any industry, unutilized capacity is undesirable.) Also, there is no shortage of tankers. More generally, your argument assumes that no investment in delivery infrastructure will occur, which is simply not borne out by history.
Also, recall that the price of oil was under $10 per barrel in 1998, just ten years ago. You should note that even during that time, these same companies were calling for the moratorium to be lifted in literature prepared by the NPC for the DOE. I hardly see how this can be equated to gauging.
- Kenneth B Medlock III
September 23, 2008 9:20PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Uncommitted
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
This is why...
Your statistical link is dead. You still don't address why companies don't drill on the acreage they are already leasing. I don't buy the supply problem arguement. I'm not an economist but it seems to me that if the product is selling this well then why flood the market with more? You are well aware that Exxon made the most money ever in the history of man last year. Just because it may be there it doesn't mean we have to give it to the oil companies. Eventually the oil will run out. Scientists agree the earth is in crisis and it's time to turn our sites on sustainable energy. Since the taxpayers will bail out the mortgage lending industries, there will be little borrowed money to use to jump start new energy industries. I will conceed that oil will continue to be used in the interim. Oil companies ought to have to prove there is no oil on the land already leased before getting more. Incidentally, this is mostly political anyway. A package was offered allowing off-shore drilling 50 miles off-shore using American-made tools and labor, if voters in each states agree and an end to tax subsities. Conservatives rejected the package.
- tjhawknest33
September 25, 2008 8:23PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Use or lose 2
tjhawknes133,
I suppose it follows then that we should have stopped drilling in 1930. After all, in 1930 we didn't have enough equipment to supply US demand in WWII, let alone present demand.
Drilling rigs and infrastructure are built as demand grows. History proves it. Your argument (and I have heard it many times) is without merit.
- hitac
September 26, 2008 8:34PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.