Should Medical Marijuana be Federally Legalized?

Should Medical Marijuana be Federally Legalized?

Millions of Americans take prescription drugs to treat a plethora of illnesses and symptoms, but not all drugs are created equal. The question of whether or not to consider marijuana a viable medical treatment remains a hot button issue. In states like California, medical marijuana clubs have flourished despite their federal illegality. Should the federal government allow states to make their own decisions, or is marijuana nothing more than a dangerous narcotic?

Next question in Politics

Dietwatch_med_rectangle_orange

  • “Yes”
  • No Objections Yet

Expedia_last_minute_travel_wide_sky
ASA

12 States Have Adopted Medical Cannabis Laws

Americans for Safe Access

Years of resistance by the federal government in recognizing the medical efficacy of cannabis, has forced numerous states to adopt their own medical marijuana laws. The U.S. government continues to maintain that, “marijuana has no currently accepted medical use,” yet twelve states have adopted medical cannabis laws, establishing protections for patients and providers. The States of Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington have all adopted medical cannabis laws, excluding patients and providers from state-level criminal penalties. Medical cannabis laws have been and will continue to be considered in dozens of additional states.

Although Congress and the Courts have not tried to overturn these laws, the government has used tactics of harassment and intimidation to thwart successful implementation of these laws. In 2007, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) conducted more than 50 raids on patients and providers resulting in the closure of dozens of distribution facilities, legal under state law, and more than 100 federal indictments. In addition, the federal government has employed the tactic of threatening landlords with criminal prosecution and asset forfeiture if they continue to lease to medical cannabis providers.

Under these conditions, the effective implementation of state medical cannabis laws is seriously hindered. Minimally, the federal government must cease its effort to undermine these laws. Ideally, the government would recognize established science, and the need by hundreds of thousands of patients in the U.S., and develop a more humane federal policy. Echoing the call by patients and providers for a federal medical cannabis policy are dozens of editorials urging Congress to address this issue.

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

"Yes" ASA
"Yes" Marijuana Policy Project
"Yes" NORML
"No" Dr Voth
"No" Drug Free America
Most Objections

Marijuana by Prescription?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Marijuana Policy Project
    Marijuana prohibition has failed. It's time for a new approach, and MPP is leading the way. Since our founding in 1995, we've been making real progress in... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.